Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 26 issue 4 (december 2005) : 309 - 312

EFFECT OF RHIZOBIUM, FYM AND CHEMICAL FERTILIZERS ON LEGUME CROPS AND NUTRIENT STATUS OF SOIL - A REVIEW

M
M.S. Singh
1College of Agriculture, Central Agricultural University, Imphal- 795 004, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Singh M.S. (2025). EFFECT OF RHIZOBIUM, FYM AND CHEMICAL FERTILIZERS ON LEGUME CROPS AND NUTRIENT STATUS OF SOIL - A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 26(4): 309 - 312. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Legume, the most important plant group concerned in symbiotic nitrogen fixation or dicotyledonous plants of the family Fabaceae. Legume crop inoculated with Rhizobium were found well nodulated and resulted increase in yield. Biological nitrogen fixation is an important process for agricultural productivity in many cropping system because of direct inputs of atmospheric nitrogen, and rotational effects such as disease control. In many agricultural situations the availability of a suitable source of nitrogen is the major factor limiting crop productivity. Addition of FYM 10 to 15 t/ha stimulated the growth and activity of microorganisms and therefore, increased growth and development of legume crops. Application of FYM and Rhizobium inoculation of legumes increased yield and made soil more fertile. N applications decreased the number of nodules formed during early growth stages of legumes. But inoculation combined with foliar application of N and P gave better seed yield.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Akbari, K.N. (2000). Legume Res., 25: 117-120.
    2. Arona, V. and Reddy, N.S. (1999). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 69: 382-383.
    3. Attia, KK (1999). J. Agric. Sci., 30(5): 189-201.
    4. Babhulkar, P.S. et al. (2002). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 48: 89-92.
    5. Bhattarai, RK (2002). M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, College of Agriculture, CAU, lrnphal.
    6. Brhada, F. et al. (1988). Develop. Plants Soil Sci., 32: 245-249.
    7. Burns, RC. and Hardy, RW.F. (1975). Nitrogen Fixation in Bacteria and Higher Plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
    8. Chawale, V.v. et al. (1993). Indian J. Agron., 38(3): 500-502.
    9. Faiyad, M.N. et al. (1991). Egyptian J. of Soi Sci., 31(3); 343-355.
    10. Gewaily, E.M. et al. (1985). Nitrogen Fixtion Research Progress, 4: 69.
    11. Vlraham, W. and Hara, a.A. (1998). Crop Production, 1: 115-135.
    12. Hernandez, L.G. and Hill, G.D. (1984). Proc. Agron. Soc. New Zealand, 14: 101-104.
    13. Kpakpo, et al. (1994). Report of the Tikai Branch of the Crop Science Society ofJapan. 118: 7-8.
    14. Mehta, A.C. et al. (1995). Indian J. Agron., 40: 709-710.
    15. Melli, M. (1990). Rivista-de-Agri-Cottura-Suhtropicale-e-Tropicale, 84: 435-455.
    16. Negm, MA et al. (1998). Egyptian J. Soil Sci., 38(1-4): 69-79.
    17. Nimje, P.M. and Seth, J. (1987). Indian. Agric. Sci., 57(6): 404-409.
    18. Parashar, A. et al. (1999). Legurne Res., 22(3): 162-166.
    19. Prabakaran, J. and Ravi, KB. (1996). Madras Agric. J., 83: 132-133.
    20. Raju, M.S. et al. (1991). Indian J. Agric. Res., 25(10): 43-48.
    21. Ramamurthy, V. and Shivashankar, K (1996). Indian J. Agron., 41: 65-68.
    22. Reddy, B.P. and Swamy, S.N. (2000). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 70: 694-696.
    23. Sachin, G. (1998). Cer Cetari Agronornicein Moldova, 31(1-2).
    24. Saleh, SA et al. (2000). Bul/. of Faculty Agric. Univ. Cairo, 51: 17-30.
    25. Sanoria, C.L. and Rani, R (1998). Indian J. Agric. Chern., 39(1): 41-45.
    26. Singh, SK and Sanoria, C.L. (2001). Indian J. Agric. Chern., 34(1-2): 23-26.
    27. Singh, M. et al. (1999). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 69: 379-381.
    28. Tomar, RKS. (1998). Indian Agric. Sci., 68: 81-82.
    29. Vance, C.P. (1997). In: Biological Fixation of Nitrogen for Ecology and Sustainable Agriculture (Legocki, H. et al., eds.). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 179-186
    Published In
    Agricultural Reviews
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 26 issue 4 (december 2005) : 309 - 312

      EFFECT OF RHIZOBIUM, FYM AND CHEMICAL FERTILIZERS ON LEGUME CROPS AND NUTRIENT STATUS OF SOIL - A REVIEW

      M
      M.S. Singh
      1College of Agriculture, Central Agricultural University, Imphal- 795 004, India

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Singh M.S. (2025). EFFECT OF RHIZOBIUM, FYM AND CHEMICAL FERTILIZERS ON LEGUME CROPS AND NUTRIENT STATUS OF SOIL - A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 26(4): 309 - 312. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      Legume, the most important plant group concerned in symbiotic nitrogen fixation or dicotyledonous plants of the family Fabaceae. Legume crop inoculated with Rhizobium were found well nodulated and resulted increase in yield. Biological nitrogen fixation is an important process for agricultural productivity in many cropping system because of direct inputs of atmospheric nitrogen, and rotational effects such as disease control. In many agricultural situations the availability of a suitable source of nitrogen is the major factor limiting crop productivity. Addition of FYM 10 to 15 t/ha stimulated the growth and activity of microorganisms and therefore, increased growth and development of legume crops. Application of FYM and Rhizobium inoculation of legumes increased yield and made soil more fertile. N applications decreased the number of nodules formed during early growth stages of legumes. But inoculation combined with foliar application of N and P gave better seed yield.

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. Akbari, K.N. (2000). Legume Res., 25: 117-120.
        2. Arona, V. and Reddy, N.S. (1999). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 69: 382-383.
        3. Attia, KK (1999). J. Agric. Sci., 30(5): 189-201.
        4. Babhulkar, P.S. et al. (2002). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 48: 89-92.
        5. Bhattarai, RK (2002). M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, College of Agriculture, CAU, lrnphal.
        6. Brhada, F. et al. (1988). Develop. Plants Soil Sci., 32: 245-249.
        7. Burns, RC. and Hardy, RW.F. (1975). Nitrogen Fixation in Bacteria and Higher Plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
        8. Chawale, V.v. et al. (1993). Indian J. Agron., 38(3): 500-502.
        9. Faiyad, M.N. et al. (1991). Egyptian J. of Soi Sci., 31(3); 343-355.
        10. Gewaily, E.M. et al. (1985). Nitrogen Fixtion Research Progress, 4: 69.
        11. Vlraham, W. and Hara, a.A. (1998). Crop Production, 1: 115-135.
        12. Hernandez, L.G. and Hill, G.D. (1984). Proc. Agron. Soc. New Zealand, 14: 101-104.
        13. Kpakpo, et al. (1994). Report of the Tikai Branch of the Crop Science Society ofJapan. 118: 7-8.
        14. Mehta, A.C. et al. (1995). Indian J. Agron., 40: 709-710.
        15. Melli, M. (1990). Rivista-de-Agri-Cottura-Suhtropicale-e-Tropicale, 84: 435-455.
        16. Negm, MA et al. (1998). Egyptian J. Soil Sci., 38(1-4): 69-79.
        17. Nimje, P.M. and Seth, J. (1987). Indian. Agric. Sci., 57(6): 404-409.
        18. Parashar, A. et al. (1999). Legurne Res., 22(3): 162-166.
        19. Prabakaran, J. and Ravi, KB. (1996). Madras Agric. J., 83: 132-133.
        20. Raju, M.S. et al. (1991). Indian J. Agric. Res., 25(10): 43-48.
        21. Ramamurthy, V. and Shivashankar, K (1996). Indian J. Agron., 41: 65-68.
        22. Reddy, B.P. and Swamy, S.N. (2000). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 70: 694-696.
        23. Sachin, G. (1998). Cer Cetari Agronornicein Moldova, 31(1-2).
        24. Saleh, SA et al. (2000). Bul/. of Faculty Agric. Univ. Cairo, 51: 17-30.
        25. Sanoria, C.L. and Rani, R (1998). Indian J. Agric. Chern., 39(1): 41-45.
        26. Singh, SK and Sanoria, C.L. (2001). Indian J. Agric. Chern., 34(1-2): 23-26.
        27. Singh, M. et al. (1999). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 69: 379-381.
        28. Tomar, RKS. (1998). Indian Agric. Sci., 68: 81-82.
        29. Vance, C.P. (1997). In: Biological Fixation of Nitrogen for Ecology and Sustainable Agriculture (Legocki, H. et al., eds.). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 179-186
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Agricultural Reviews

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)