Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Agricultural Reviews
Print ISSN: 0253-1496
Online ISSN: 0976-0741
NASS Rating
4.84

Chief Editor:
Pradeep K. Sharma
Sher-e-Kashmir Uni. of Agri. Sciences and Technology, J&K, INDIA
Frequency:Bi-monthly
Indexing:
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abs...

Agricultural Reviews, volume 27 issue 4 (december 2006) : 308 - 312

ROLE OF MAJOR NUTRIENTS IN COTTON - A CRITICAL REVIEW

K. Kalaichelvi, C. Chinnusamyl, A. Arul Swaminathan2
1Department of Agronomy, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore - 641 003, Tamil Nadu, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Kalaichelvi K., Chinnusamyl C., Swaminathan2 Arul A. (2025). ROLE OF MAJOR NUTRIENTS IN COTTON - A CRITICAL REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 27(4): 308 - 312. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Cotton, the "King of fibres" is often quoted as •White gold' because of its higher commercial
value. Our country ranks first in cotton acreage but the productivity is less. One of the major
constraints in cotton is nutrient management. Cotton is a deep-rooted crop and voracious feeder
of nutrients, responds weIl for nutrients. When the nutrients are supplied at sub optimal level,
the diversion of nutrients to the reproductive sympodial branches gets disrupted leading to boIl
shedding and poor yield. On the other hand, excess application of fertilizer has its own limitation
in promoting vegetative growth. The optimal dose of nutrients builds up a favourable condition
in increasing cotton productivity. Response of nutrients in cotton varies among varieties and
region and therefore, the recommendation of nutrients are to be made with region specific doses
for increasing the productivity.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. All India Co-ordinated Cotton hnprovement Project (1994). Annual Progress Report, Coimbatore Centre, pp. 20-22.
    2. All India Co-ordinated Cotton hnprovement Project (2002). Annual Progress Report, Coimbatore Centre, pp. 1-3.
    3. Cassman,K.G. et a/. (1990). Crop Sci., 30: 672-677.
    4. Chandrasekaran, B. (1977). M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore.
    5. Hunsigi, G. et a/. (1972). Indian J. Agron., 27: 329-331.
    6. Hussain. et a/. (2000). Sarhad J. Agric., 16(2): 143-147.
    7. Ibrahim, M.A.M. et a/. (1997). Soil Sci. Plant Analysis, 28(1-2): 173-181.
    8. Jaganathan, N.T. and Venkitaswamy. R. (1996). Madras. Agric. J., 83(3): 159-161.
    9. 312 AGRICULTURAL REVIEWS
    10. Jaganathan, N.T. et al. (1994). Madras Agrlc. J., 81(10): 540-541.
    11. Jain, S.C. et al. (1983). Indian J. Agron., 28: 59-64.
    12. Khandare, R.N. et aI. (2002). J. sons and Crops, 12(1): 71-74.
    13. Khawale Vijayakumar Shriram and Prasad, M. (2001). Fertil. News, 46(5): 57-58.
    14. Khizdiranazarav, A (1984). Uzbenshkii Biologicheskii Zhurnal, 4: 68-69. Cotton and Tropical Fibres Abstrs.,
    15. 10(8): 670. .
    16. Krishnan, P.K. and Lourdraj, AC. (1997). Madras Agrlc. J., 4(6): 330-334.
    17. Uu, R.R. et aI. (1992). China Cottons:2: 20-21.
    18. Malik, M.NA et al. (1992). Pakistan J. Science and Indus. Res., 3(7/8): 288-290. "I
    19. Malik, R.K. et al. (1998). J. PI. Plant, 21: 90-92.
    20. Manoharan, G. (1978). M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, TamU Nadu Agricultural University, COimbatore.
    21. Mayee, C.G. et aI. (2002). THE HINDU, pp. 129.
    22. Mool Chand, et a/. (1997). Indian J. Agron., 42: 528-530.
    23. More, S.D. and Agale, B.N. (1993). J. Indian Soc. Soil. Sci., 41: 498-500.
    24. Mukund Joshi et aI. (1999). Mysore J. Agrlc. Sci., 33: 97-100.
    25. Nalayini, P. et a/. (2001). Indian J. Agron., 46: 557-562.
    26. Ougunwole, J.O. et aI. (2003). Crop Res., 25: 50-57.
    27. Perumal, N.K. (1999). Indian J. Plant Physio/., 4: 65-67.
    28. Prasad. M. (2000). Fertil. News., 45(8): 63-64.
    29. Rajeev Gopal et a/. (2001). Ann. Agric. Res., 22: 253-257.
    30. Ramprakash et aJ. (2001). Ann. Agrlc. Res., 22: 107-110.
    31. Ravankar, H.N. and Deshmukh, VA (1994). 'PKV Res. J., 18: 60-62.
    32. Sagarkar, B.K. et a/.#(2002). Indian J. Agrl. Res., 36(3): 200-203.
    33. Sasthri, G. et al. (2001). Madras Agric. J., 88(1-3): 60-63.
    34. Selvakumari, G. et aI. (2000). Department of Soil science and Agricultural chemistry, Tamil Nadu Agricultl1ral University, COimbatore. .
    35. Selvakumari, G. et aJ. (1998). National Sem. Development in SoU Science. 63nl Annual Convention, Nov., 16-19, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar.
    36. Srinivasan, G. (2001). Indian J. Agron., 46: 552-556.
    37. Swaji, B.V. et a/. (1994). PK\I. Res. J., 18: 102-103.
    38. Tewoide. T. et aI; (1994). Agron. J., 86: 303-309.
    39. Tomar, R.S.S. et aL.(2000). Indian J. Agron., 45: 776-781.
    40. Tomar, S.K. and Dhyani, B.P. (1995). Indian J. Agron., 40: 151-153.
    41. Velu, V. and Balasundaram, S. (1980). Seminar on Cotton, TNAU, AC and RI, Madura!.
    42. Venkatakrishnan, AS. (1994). Madras Agrlc. J., 81: 213-214.
    43. Venugopalan, MV and Blaise, D. (2001). Indian J. Agron., 46: 346-353.
    44. Wankhade, ST. et aJ. (2001). Crop Res., 21: 38-40
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)