Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma
Print ISSN 0253-1496
Online ISSN 0976-0741
NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :

Quarterly (March, June, September & December)

Indexing Services :

AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Submit

Agricultural Reviews, volume 27 issue 3 (september 2006) : 232 - 234

MUSTARD AND RAPESEED RESPONSE TO AZOTOBACTER - A REVIEW

M.S. Singh, S. Dutta

Affiliations

¹College of Agriculture, Central Agricultural University, Imphal - 795 004, India

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Singh M.S., Dutta S. (2024). MUSTARD AND RAPESEED RESPONSE TO AZOTOBACTER - A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 27(3): 232 - 234. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The use of bio-agents in acclimatizing tissue-cultured plantlets holds great promises in improving micropropagation systems in plants. The bio-agents such as VAM, bacteria and others are reported to substantially enhance the establishment rate of the micropropagated plants. They empower the plants with extra molecular weapons to tackle the situation once exposed to the ambient environment. The main beneficial effects reported are the avoidance of transplanting shock, shorter weaning phase, higher plant growth variates and higher content of total soluble sugars. Moreover, colonization of plants with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can improve growth by increasing uptake of minerals, improving water relations of the host plant and increasing drought resistance.

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Abbas, Z. and Okon, Y. (1993). Soil Biol. Biochem., 25: 1075-1083.
Allison, F.E. (1947). Soil Sci., 64: 413-427.
Anonymous (2001). In : Biofertilisers (A Training Manual). Regional Biofertiliser Development Centre, Imphal.
Chauhan, D.R. et al. (1995a). Indian J. Agron., 40: 86-90.
Chauhan, D.R. et al. (1995b). Indian J. Agron., 40: 639-642.
Chauhan, D.R. et al. (1996). Indian J. Agron., 41: 620-623.
Dutta, S. and Singh, M.S. (2002). Indian J. Hill Farming, 15: 44-46.
Kumar, V. and Kumar, V. (1944a). Crop-Res. (Hissar), 8: 449-451.
Kumar, V. and Kumar, V. (1944a). Crop-Res. (Hissar), 7: 446-450.
Kumar, V. and Kumar, V. (1995). Crop-Res. (Hissar) 9: 50-53.
Kundu, B.S. and Sharma, P.K. (1994). Environ. Ecol., 12: 749-751.
Maryenko, V.G. (1964). Dokt TSHA, No. 99 pp. 399-406, 2: 357-360.
Nanwal, R.K. et al. (2000). Annals Biol. Ludhiana, 16: 85-86.
Narula, N. et al. (1993). Annals Biol, Ludhiana, 9: 144-148.
Patra, S.K. et al. (1989). Environ. Ecol., 7: 533-536.
Sharma, S.K. et al. (1995). Agric. Sci. Digest, 15: 58-60.
Sharma, S.K. et al. (1997). H.A.U. J. Res., 27: 111-115.
Sharma, S.K. et al. (1997). Indian J. Agron., 12: 749-751.
Sheloumova, A. (1941). Microbi. USSR, 10: 33-41.
Singh, P. and Bhargava, S.C. (1994). J. Agric., 122: 241-247.

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reviewed By

Share options

Editorial Board

View all (0)

MUSTARD AND RAPESEED RESPONSE TO AZOTOBACTER - A REVIEW

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Reviewed By

In this Article

APC

Publish With US

Become a Reviewer/Member

Open Access

Products and Services

Support and Policies

Editorial Board