Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 27 issue 3 (september 2006) : 216 - 222

PHYTOREMEDIATION - A REVIEW

A
A.V. Ramanjaneyulu
G
Gajendra Giri
1Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi - 100 012, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Ramanjaneyulu A.V., Giri Gajendra (2025). PHYTOREMEDIATION - A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 27(3): 216 - 222. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The scope of increasing the area cultivated for forages is rather limited, because of mounting pressure and preferential need for food and commercial crops. Hence fodder production has to be increased per unit area per unit time. Quality of forage is also very important to animal health and performance. Forage quality can be improved and the toxic principles can be alleviated by efficient nutrient management. Keeping these points in view, the literature pertaining to the fertilizer management in different forage crops to obtain higher biomass production and good quality fodder has been reviewed

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Ali, M.B. et al. (1999). Chemosphere, 39: 2171-2182.
    2. Anderson, C.W.N. et al. (1999). J. Geoche. Explor., 67: 407-4l5.
    3. Baker, A.J.M. (1987). New Phytol., 106: 93-111.
    4. Baker, A.J.M. et al. (2000). In: Phytoremediation of Contaminated Soil and Water (Terry, N.; Banuelos, G. and
    5. Vangronsveld, J. eds.) pp. 85-107.
    6. Banuelos, G.S. and Meek (1990). J. Environ. Qual., 19: 727-777.
    7. Banuelos, G.S. et al. (1997). J. Envrton. Qual., 26: 639-646.
    8. Blaylock, M.J. et al. (1997). Environ. Sci. and Techn., 31: 860-865.
    9. Bordjiba, O. et al. (2001). J. Environ. Qual., 30: 418-426.
    10. Brooks, R.R. (1998). Plants that Hyperaccumulate Heavymetal. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
    11. Brune, A. et al. (1994). PI. Cell and Environ., 17: 153-162.
    12. Burken, J.G. and Schnoor, J.L. (1999). Intern. J. Phytorem., 1(2): 139-151.
    13. Burken, J.G. and Schnoor, J.L. (1997). Environ. Sci. Technol., 31: 1399-1406.
    14. Chancy, R. (1983). Noyes Data Corp, Park Bridge, Newzealand.
    15. Deng-hui, S. et al. (1985). In: Azolla utilisation. Proc. Workshop on azolla use. Fujian, China, pp. 274.
    16. Vol. 27, No. 3, 2006 221
    17. Gupta, U.C. and Gupta, S.C. (1998). Commun. in Soil Sci. and PI. Anal., 29: 1491-1522.
    18. Gong, P. et al. (1999). Arch Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 36: 152-157.
    19. Hansen, D. et al. (1998). Environ. Sci. and Techn., 32: 2004-2008.
    20. Huang, J.W. et al. (1998). Environ. Sci. and Techn., 32: 2004-2008.
    21. Jaffre, T. (1980). Travoux et Documents de, Paris, pp. 3.
    22. Komives, T. et al. (1994). Cereal Res. Commun., 22: 99-103.
    23. Lanza, G.R. and Flathman, P.E. (2001). Phytoremediation technologies: Hazardous and Radioactive waste
    24. treatment technologies Handbook (Chang Ho. Oh, Baca Raton) CRC Press, pp. 5.6-1 to 5.6-13.
    25. Lasat, M.M. et al. (1996). Pl. Physio., 112: 1715-1722.
    26. Ma Leena (1999). Water and Air Pollution, 110: 1-16.
    27. Panda, A.K. (1996). Indian J. Environ. Hlth., 38: 51-53.
    28. Ramanjaneyulu, A.V. and Giri, G. (2004). Kurukshetra, 53(12): 45-48.
    29. Reeves, R.D. and Baker, A.J.M. (2000). In: Phytoremediation of Toxic Metals : using plants to clean up the
    30. environment (Raskin, I. and Ensley, B.D. eds.) Wiley, New York, pp. 193-229.
    31. Rio, M. et al. (2000). Fresenius Environ. Bull., 9(5-6): 328-332.
    32. Salt, D.E. et al. (1995). Biotech., 13: 468-475.
    33. Sanger, S. et al. (1998). Phytochem., 47(3): 339-347.
    34. Shaandeh, H. and Hossand, L.R. (2000). Intern. J. Phytorem., 2(1): 31-51.
    35. Singh, P.K. and Mahapatra, J.K. (2000). In: The changing scenario in plant species. (Jaiswal V.S. et al., eds.)
    36. Allied Publishers, pp. 402-422.
    37. Tel-or Elisha (1999). Israel Patent B 0597. Yissum Research and Development Co., Hebrew Jerusalem Univesity.
    38. Vassil, A.D. et al. (1998). Phytophysiol., 117: 47-454.
    39. Wenzer, W.W. et al. (1999). In: Bioremediation of Contaminated Soils. (Andriano, D.C. et al., eds.) SSSA,
    40. Madison,WI, Monograph No. 37, pp. 457-508.
    41. Yong-huang, W. and Wei-zhen, X. (1985). Proc. C Workshop on Azolla use, Fuzhou, Fcejian, China, pp. 282
    Published In
    Agricultural Reviews
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 27 issue 3 (september 2006) : 216 - 222

      PHYTOREMEDIATION - A REVIEW

      A
      A.V. Ramanjaneyulu
      G
      Gajendra Giri
      1Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi - 100 012, India

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Ramanjaneyulu A.V., Giri Gajendra (2025). PHYTOREMEDIATION - A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 27(3): 216 - 222. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      The scope of increasing the area cultivated for forages is rather limited, because of mounting pressure and preferential need for food and commercial crops. Hence fodder production has to be increased per unit area per unit time. Quality of forage is also very important to animal health and performance. Forage quality can be improved and the toxic principles can be alleviated by efficient nutrient management. Keeping these points in view, the literature pertaining to the fertilizer management in different forage crops to obtain higher biomass production and good quality fodder has been reviewed

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. Ali, M.B. et al. (1999). Chemosphere, 39: 2171-2182.
        2. Anderson, C.W.N. et al. (1999). J. Geoche. Explor., 67: 407-4l5.
        3. Baker, A.J.M. (1987). New Phytol., 106: 93-111.
        4. Baker, A.J.M. et al. (2000). In: Phytoremediation of Contaminated Soil and Water (Terry, N.; Banuelos, G. and
        5. Vangronsveld, J. eds.) pp. 85-107.
        6. Banuelos, G.S. and Meek (1990). J. Environ. Qual., 19: 727-777.
        7. Banuelos, G.S. et al. (1997). J. Envrton. Qual., 26: 639-646.
        8. Blaylock, M.J. et al. (1997). Environ. Sci. and Techn., 31: 860-865.
        9. Bordjiba, O. et al. (2001). J. Environ. Qual., 30: 418-426.
        10. Brooks, R.R. (1998). Plants that Hyperaccumulate Heavymetal. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
        11. Brune, A. et al. (1994). PI. Cell and Environ., 17: 153-162.
        12. Burken, J.G. and Schnoor, J.L. (1999). Intern. J. Phytorem., 1(2): 139-151.
        13. Burken, J.G. and Schnoor, J.L. (1997). Environ. Sci. Technol., 31: 1399-1406.
        14. Chancy, R. (1983). Noyes Data Corp, Park Bridge, Newzealand.
        15. Deng-hui, S. et al. (1985). In: Azolla utilisation. Proc. Workshop on azolla use. Fujian, China, pp. 274.
        16. Vol. 27, No. 3, 2006 221
        17. Gupta, U.C. and Gupta, S.C. (1998). Commun. in Soil Sci. and PI. Anal., 29: 1491-1522.
        18. Gong, P. et al. (1999). Arch Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 36: 152-157.
        19. Hansen, D. et al. (1998). Environ. Sci. and Techn., 32: 2004-2008.
        20. Huang, J.W. et al. (1998). Environ. Sci. and Techn., 32: 2004-2008.
        21. Jaffre, T. (1980). Travoux et Documents de, Paris, pp. 3.
        22. Komives, T. et al. (1994). Cereal Res. Commun., 22: 99-103.
        23. Lanza, G.R. and Flathman, P.E. (2001). Phytoremediation technologies: Hazardous and Radioactive waste
        24. treatment technologies Handbook (Chang Ho. Oh, Baca Raton) CRC Press, pp. 5.6-1 to 5.6-13.
        25. Lasat, M.M. et al. (1996). Pl. Physio., 112: 1715-1722.
        26. Ma Leena (1999). Water and Air Pollution, 110: 1-16.
        27. Panda, A.K. (1996). Indian J. Environ. Hlth., 38: 51-53.
        28. Ramanjaneyulu, A.V. and Giri, G. (2004). Kurukshetra, 53(12): 45-48.
        29. Reeves, R.D. and Baker, A.J.M. (2000). In: Phytoremediation of Toxic Metals : using plants to clean up the
        30. environment (Raskin, I. and Ensley, B.D. eds.) Wiley, New York, pp. 193-229.
        31. Rio, M. et al. (2000). Fresenius Environ. Bull., 9(5-6): 328-332.
        32. Salt, D.E. et al. (1995). Biotech., 13: 468-475.
        33. Sanger, S. et al. (1998). Phytochem., 47(3): 339-347.
        34. Shaandeh, H. and Hossand, L.R. (2000). Intern. J. Phytorem., 2(1): 31-51.
        35. Singh, P.K. and Mahapatra, J.K. (2000). In: The changing scenario in plant species. (Jaiswal V.S. et al., eds.)
        36. Allied Publishers, pp. 402-422.
        37. Tel-or Elisha (1999). Israel Patent B 0597. Yissum Research and Development Co., Hebrew Jerusalem Univesity.
        38. Vassil, A.D. et al. (1998). Phytophysiol., 117: 47-454.
        39. Wenzer, W.W. et al. (1999). In: Bioremediation of Contaminated Soils. (Andriano, D.C. et al., eds.) SSSA,
        40. Madison,WI, Monograph No. 37, pp. 457-508.
        41. Yong-huang, W. and Wei-zhen, X. (1985). Proc. C Workshop on Azolla use, Fuzhou, Fcejian, China, pp. 282
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Agricultural Reviews

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)