Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Quarterly (March, June, September & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Reviews, volume 28 issue 4 (december 2007) : 289-294

RESPONSE OF COTTON (GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM L.) TO INORGANIC NITROGEN, LEGUME INCORPORATION AND FYM – A REVIEW

K.Mahavishnan, *K.Bhanu Rekha
1ITC, R & D Centre, Hyderabad - 500034, India.

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- K.Mahavishnan, Rekha *K.Bhanu (2024). RESPONSE OF COTTON (GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM L.) TO INORGANIC NITROGEN, LEGUME INCORPORATION AND FYM – A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 28(4): 289-294. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is the king of fibre crops, a crop of prosperity, and is an industrial commodity of worldwide importance. Amongst the cotton growing countries, India occupies the foremost position in acreage, but production is only 9 per cent of the total output. Excessive vegetative growth, boll shedding, imbalanced use of organic and inorganic fertilizers and poor agronomic practices largely attribute low productivity of cotton in India. The possible ways to increase the productivity is through the introduction of high yielding varieties and formulating better production technology including nutrient management practices.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Balasubramanian, R. et al. (1994). Madras Agric. J. 81:342-344.
    2. Basavannappa, M.A. and Biradar, D.P, (2003). Madras Agric. J., 90:86-90.
    3. Bharathi, G. et al. (2003). Madras Agric. J., 90:97-102.
    4. Bhaskar, K.S. et al. (1993). Fertil. News., 10:30-32.
    5. Blaise, D. and Rao, M.R.K. (2004). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 74:276-279.
    6. Blaise, D. and Singh, V (2004). In. Proc. Changing World Over Cotton Research, Development and Policy in Context.
    7. Hyderabad.
    8. Bondada, B.R. et al. (1996). Crop Sci., 36:127-133.
    9. Brar, A.S. et al (1996). J. Indian Soc. Cotton Imp., 21:41-44.
    10. Brar, M.S. and Brar, A.S. (2004). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 74:472-476.
    11. VVooll.. 2288,, NNoo.. 44,, 22000077 229933
    12. Chand, M. et al (1997). Indian J. Agron., 42:528-530.
    13. Chandrasekaran, N. (2004). Madras Agric. J., 91: 296-301.
    14. Charjan, Y.D. and Gaikwad, C.B. (2005). Indian J. Agron., 50:176-180.
    15. Chhabra, K.L. and Bishnoi,V (1993).J. Cotton Res. Dev., 9:121-126.
    16. Deshmukh, S.C. et al (1996). J. Cotton Res. Dev., 10:162-165.
    17. Ghadage,H.L. et al.(2005). Indian J. Agron., 50:159-161.
    18. Gidnavar, V.S. et al. (1992). Farming Systems. 8: 3-55.
    19. Jackson, B.S. and Gerik T.J. (1990). Agron. J., 82:483-488.
    20. Kalyankumar, G.K. et al. (2004). In. Proc. Changing World Order Cotton Research Development and Policy in
    21. Context. Hyderabad.
    22. Katkar, R.N. et al (2002). J. Cotton Res. Dev., 16:89-92.
    23. Khippal, A. and Nehra D.S. (1995). J. Cotton Res. Dev., 9: 216-219.
    24. Kirankumar, K.A. et al. (2003). Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 16: 591-594.
    25. Krishnan, P.K. and Lourduraj, A.C. (1997). Madras Agric. J., 84: 330-334.
    26. Krishnasawamy, V. and Ramaswamy, K.R. (1984). Madras Agric. J., 71:709-711.
    27. Krishnaswamy, A. et al. (1995). Madras Agric. J., 82:584-587.
    28. Kubsad, V.S. et al. (2004). Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 17: 440-444.
    29. La Mare, P.H. (1972). Expl. Agric. 8:299-310.
    30. Maliwal, G.L. et al. (1999). Indian J. Agron., 44: 200-202.
    31. Mane, V.S. et al. (1998). J. Cotton Res. Dev., 12: 166-174.
    32. Manjappa, K. et al. (1997). Indian J. Agron., 42:184-187.
    33. Marimuthu, S. et al. (2004). Madras Agric. J., 91:317-319.
    34. Mathur, G.M. (1997). J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 45:288-292.
    35. McConnell, J.S. et al. (1992). J. Plant Nutr., 15: 457-468.
    36. Mukerji, N. and Verma, B.L. (1994). Madras Agric. J., 81:338-340.
    37. Muralidharan, C. and Solaimalai, A. (2005). Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 18: 1-3
    38. Muthuchamy, I. and Subramanian, K. et al., (2004). Madras Agric. J., 91:19-22
    39. Nalayini, P.and Kandasamy, O.S. (2003). Indian J. Agric. Res., 37:269-274.
    40. Nambiar, K.K.M. (1985). Fertil. News., 30:56-66.
    41. Nayak, G.V. et al. (1997). J. Indian Soc. Cotton Improv., pp. 131-136.
    42. Padole, V.R. et al (1998). P.K.V. Res. J., 22:6-8.
    43. Pagaria, T.M. et al. (1995). P.K.V. Res. J., 19: 87-88.
    44. Prabhakaran, C. and James Pichai, G. (2003). J. Soils and Crops., 13 : 172-175.
    45. Prabhakaran, M. (1996). M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Tamilnadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
    46. Prasad, M. (2000). Indian J. Agron., 45:489-498.
    47. Prasad, M. and Prasad, R. (1996). Indian J. Plant Physiol., 1:286-287.
    48. Prasad, M. and Prasad., R. (1998). Indian J. Agron., 43: 162-164.
    49. Prasad, M. et al.(2005). Indian J. Agron., 50:228-230.
    50. Ramamoorthy, K., P. et al. (1994). Madras Agric. J., 82:674-675.
    51. Ramanjaneyulu, A.V. and Bucha reddy, B. (2002). Andhra Agrl.J., 49: 24-30.
    52. Ramesh Babu. (1998). Indian J. Agron., 43: 261-263.
    53. Ramparkash and Prasad, M. (2000). Indian J. Agron., 45:263-268.
    54. Ravankar, H.N. and Deshmukh, V.S. (1994). P.K.V. Res. J., 18:60-62.
    55. Ravankar, H.N. and Laharia, G.S. (1994). P.K.V. Res. J., 18:104-105.
    56. Ravishankar, G. et al. (2005). Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 18: 302-305.
    57. Sagarka, B.S. et al. (2002). Indian J. Agric. Res., 36:200-204.
    58. Sagarka, B.S. et al. (2002). Indian J. Agron., 47:544-549.
    59. Sawaji, B. et al. (1994). P. K. V. Res. J., 18:19-20.
    60. Sharma, A.P. et al., (1997). J. Cotton Res. Dev., 11:16-21.
    61. Sharma, R.K. and Tomar, R.S.S. (1995). Agri. Sci. Digest., 15:5-7.
    62. 229944 AGRIACGURLITCUURTAULR ASLC IERNECVEI EDWISGEST
    63. Sherene, T. and Rajkannan, B. (2003). Madras Agric. J., 90:247-251.
    64. Singh, I. and Chauhan, G.S. (1993). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 63:499-500.
    65. Singh, J. (1995). J. Cotton. Res. Dev., 9:24-27.
    66. Singh, J. et al. (1999). J. Cotton. Res. Dev., 13:120-122.
    67. Singh, T. and Brar, J.S. (1998). J. Cotton. Res. Dev., 12:242-244.
    68. Singh, T. and Brar, J.S. (2000). J. Cotton. Res. Dev., 14:33-35.
    69. Solaiappan, U. (2002). Madras Agric. J., 89:448-450.
    70. Srinivasan, G. (2003). Indian J. Agron., 48: 59-62.
    71. Srinivasan, G. and Venkatesan, K. (2002). Indian J. Agron., 47:120-1213.
    72. Srinivasan, G.et al. (2002). Madras Agric. J., 89:56-58.
    73. Subramaniyan, V. et al. (1995). Madras agric. J., 82:40-41.
    74. Sundaravadivel, K., T. et al. (1999). Madras Agric. J., 86:384-388.
    75. Suresh, P. et al. (2005). Indian J. Agron., 50:162-164.
    76. Tomar, R.S.S. et al . (1994). Indian J. Agron., 39:397-402.
    77. Velayudam, A. et al. (2002). Madras Agric. J., 89:59-63.
    78. Venugopalan, M.V. and Blaise, D. (2001). Indian J. Agron., 46:346-353.
    79. Wani, S, P. et al. (1995). Pl. Soil., 174: 29-49.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)