Published In
Agricultural Reviews
Article Metrics

0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
In this Article
APC
APC cover the cost of turning a manuscript into a published manuscript through peer-review process, editorial work as well as the cost of hosting, distributing, indexing and promoting the manuscript.
Publish With US
Submit your manuscript through user friendly platform and acquire the maximum impact for your research by publishing with ARCC Journals.
Become a Reviewer/Member
Join our esteemed reviewers panel and become an editorial board member with international experts in the domain of numerous specializations.
Open Access
Filling the gap between research and communication ARCC provide Open Access of all journals which empower research community in all the ways which is accessible to all.
Products and Services
We provide prime quality of services to assist you select right product of your requirement.
Support and Policies
Finest policies are designed to ensure world class support to our authors, members and readers. Our efficient team provides best possible support for you.
Follow us
volume 28 issue 1 (march 2007) : 1-9
CURRENT STATUS OF RESEARCH ON WEB BLIGHT DISEASE OF URD BEAN: A REVIEW
1Department of Plant Pathology
G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar-263145, India
ABSTRACT
The urd bean (Vigna mungo (L.l Hepper) is an important pulse crop of India. It is rich in
phosphoric acid. The genus Rhizoctonia was described to accommodate the non sporulating root
pathogen R. erocorum. The pathogen was observed on diseased potato tubers and named it as
Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn. Genus Rhizoctonia has gained the reputation of being a widespread,
destructive and versatile plant pathogen. It was reported that 26 - 280C temperatures and 90 - 100 percent relative humidity (RHl favoured maximum disease development. R. solani Kuhn is a common soil borne pathogen that has many hosts forms sclerotia in/on soi! and survives for a long period in the absence of a host either as sclerotia or thick walled brown hyphae in plants debries. The web blight disease severity is recorded by using 1 - I) rating scale. Cultural practices, chemical control and biological control are effective methods for management the web blight of urd bean.
phosphoric acid. The genus Rhizoctonia was described to accommodate the non sporulating root
pathogen R. erocorum. The pathogen was observed on diseased potato tubers and named it as
Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn. Genus Rhizoctonia has gained the reputation of being a widespread,
destructive and versatile plant pathogen. It was reported that 26 - 280C temperatures and 90 - 100 percent relative humidity (RHl favoured maximum disease development. R. solani Kuhn is a common soil borne pathogen that has many hosts forms sclerotia in/on soi! and survives for a long period in the absence of a host either as sclerotia or thick walled brown hyphae in plants debries. The web blight disease severity is recorded by using 1 - I) rating scale. Cultural practices, chemical control and biological control are effective methods for management the web blight of urd bean.
KEYWORDS
REFERENCES
- Abawi, G. S. (1985). Plant Dis. 69: 158·161.
- Adams, G. C. Jr. and Butler, E. E. (1983 b). Phytopathology. 73: 152·155.
- Alam, S. S. eta/(1985). PakistanJ. Bot. 17:165.
- Allinson, J. L. (1951). Plant Dis. Reptr. 35: 372-373.
- Anonymous. (2003). All India Coordinated Research Project on MULLaR?: 18
- Bains, S. S. and Dhaliwal, H. S. (1993). Indian Bot. Reptr. 11: 11-14.
- Baker, R. and Martinson, C. A. (1970). In: Rhizoctonia solani, Biology and Pathology. (J.R. Parmeter, Jr Ed.), , University of California Press, Berkeley. 172-188p
- Basandrai, A. K. et a/. (1999). Indian J. Agric. Sci. 69: 507-508.
- Bauske, E. M. and Kirby, H. W. O. (1992). Plant Dis. 76: 236-239.
- Bhattacharya, A. and Poy, A. K. (1998). Indian Phytopathol. 51: 81-86.
- Boosalis, M. G. and Scharen, A. L. (1959). Phytopathology. 49: 192 ~198.
- Buder. E. E. and Bracker, C. E. (1970). In: Biology and Pathology ofRhizoctonia solani (J.R. Parmeter, Jr Ed.), University of California Press, Berkeley. 32·53p.
- Cardenas, M. R. (1989). Ph.D. Thesis. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
- Carpenter, ,J. B. (1949). Phytopathology. 39: 980-985.
- ClAT. (1985). Centro International de Agriculture Tropical. 263 - 267.
- Cotterill, P. J. and Mclean, L. K. (1992). Plant Prot. Quart. 7: 51-54.
- De Candolle, A. P. (1815). Mem. Mus. D Hist. Nat., 2: 209 - 216.
- Donk, M. A. (1956). Fungi Reinwardita, 3: 363 - 379.
- Dubey S. C. And Dwivedi, R. P. (1992). Agric. So. Digest. 12: 90 - 92.
- 8 AGRICULTURAL REVIEWS
- Dubey, S. C. (1997). Indian Phytopathol. 50: 119-120.
- Dubey, S. C. (1998). J. Myco. Pl. Pathol. 28: 15-18.
- Dubey, S. C. and Patel, B. (2001). Indian Phytopathol. 54: 206-209.
- Dugger, B.M. (1995). Ann. Missouri Botanical Garden. 2: 403-458.
- Dwivedi, R. P. (1977). Ph.D. Thesis. Kanpur University, Kanpur.
- Dwivedi, R P. and Dubey, S. C. (1986). Farm Sci J. 1: 33-37.
- Dwivedi, R. P. and Saxena, H. K. (1974). Indian J. Farm Sci. 2: 100.
- Uwivedi, R P and Saxena, H. K (1975). /ndianJ. Farm Sci. 3: 114-115.
- Dwivedi,V. B. and Dwivedi, R. P. (1999). 51" Annual Meeting and National Symposium on Seed Health Care And
- Phytosanitation For Sustainable Agriculture. U.S.R., Lucknow, feb.17-19, 1999.
- Echandi, E. (1965). Phytopathology. 55: 698-699.
- Elazequi, F A. and Mew, T. W. (1983). Trap. Grain Legume Bull. 27: 3.
- Flentje, N. T. (1956). Trans. Brit Mycol. Soc. 39: 343-356.
- Galindo, J. J. (1983). Plant Dis. 67: 1016-1021.
- Galindo, M. P. et a/. (1982). Plant Dis. 66: 390-394.
- Galvez et al. (1980). Centro Internacional de Agricultura Trapical. 101-110.
- Gangopadhyay, S. and Grover, RK (1984). Indian J. Mycol. Pl. Pathol. 14: 57-58.
- Harville, B. G. etal. (1996). Crap Sci. 36: 563-566.
- Ja\a\\, B. L. (1')8')\. H\sa~. Ccmso\\dated Re?ottOn Khat\{ Pulse, 144-145\1,
- Joye, G. F. et al. (1990). Plant Dis. 14: 158-160.
- Kataria, H. R. and Grover, R. K. (1987). Pl,mt and Soil. 103: 57-66.
- Kataria, H. R. et al. (1989). Crop Protection. 8: 399 - 404.
- Kotila, J. E. (1947). J. Agric. Res. 74: 289 - 314
- Kuhn, J.G. (1858). Gustav Bosselman, Berlin, 312p
- Kumar, R. and Lakpale, N. (2000). Adv. Pl. Sci. 13: 327-328.
- Kumar, R. et aJ. (1999). Ann. Agric Res. 20: 468-471.
- Lal, S. (1984). Indian farming. 36: 3-4.
- Lam, S. T. and Gaffney, T. D. (1993). Wiley-Liss, Inc. North Carolina pp. 291-320.
- Leach, L. D. and Devey, A. E. (1938). J. Agric. Res. 56: 619-632.
- Liu, Z. (1991). Plant Dis. 15: 682-687.
- Marian, S. and Manibhushanrao, K. (1990). Trap. Agric. 67: 207-208.
- Mathew, A. and Gupta, S. K. (1996). Indian J. MycoI. Pl. Pathol. 26: 171-177.
- Mathew, A. and Gupta, S. K. (1996). Indian J. Mycol. Pl. Pathol. 26: 171-177.
- Matz, J. (1917). Phytopathology. 7: 110 - 117
- Matz, J. (1921). Cire No-57. San Juan Puerto Rica, 8 pp.
- Mildenhall, J. P. and Williams, P. H. (1973). Phytopathology. 63: 276-283.
- Mishra, B. and Dubey, S. C. (1991). Indian PhytopathoJ. 44: 244-246.
- Mittal, R. K. (1999). J. Mycol. Pl. PathoI. 29: 128-130.
- Mukhopadhyay, A. N. et al. (1992). FAD Pl. Prot. Bull. 40: 21-30.
- Murray, D. I. L. (1984). Aust. J. Bot. 32: 101-108.
- Naiki, T. and Ui, T. (1981). Mem. Fac. Agric. Hokkaido Univ. 12: 262 -269.
- 0' Neill, N. R. et al. (1977).61: 713-716.
- Ogoshi, A. (1975). Bull. Natl. Agric. Ser. C. 30: 1-63.
- Ogoshi, A. (1987). Ann. Rev. Phytopath. 25: 125-143.
- Oladiran, A. O. (1980). Trop. Grain Legume Bull. 13-15.
- Olaya, G. (1994). Plant Dis. 18: 805-810.
- Oyekan, P. O. (1979). Plant Dis. Reptr. 63: 574-577.
- Patel, B. L. and Bhargava, P. K. (1998). Indian J. Agric. Sci. 68: 277-278.
- Pierre, R. E. (1979).Proc. Regional workshop on tropical grain legume. Faculty of Agric. University of West Indies, SI. Augustine, Trininad (unpublished).
- Ploper, L.D. (1981). Revista Industrial y Agricola de Tucuman. 58: 101-111.
- Poromarto, S. H. etal. (1998). Phytopathology. 88: 1056-1067.
- Rahman, M. H. et al. (1995). Bangladesh J. PI. Pathol. 1: 19-22.
- Rajnauth, G. (1987). Trap. Agric. 64: 356-358.
- Reddy, KS. et al. (1992). Indian J. Pl. Prot. 20: 37-42.
- Saksena, H. K. and Dwivedi, R. P. (1973). Indian J. Farms Sci. 1: 58 - 61.
- Vol. 28. No.1. 2007
- Saksena. H. K. and Vaartaja. O. (1961). Can. J. Bot. 39: 627 - 647.
- Schroth, M. N. and Cook. R. K. (1964). Phytopathology. 54: 670-673.
- Sharma. J. and Tripathi, H. S. (2002). Indian Phytopathol. 55: 90-91.
- Sharma, S. R. and Sohi, H. S. (1981). Indian J. Mycol. PI. Patho. 11: 216·220.
- Sims. A. C. Jr. (1956). Phytopathology. 46: 413417.
- Singh. A. and Malhotra, S. K. (1994). Bhartiya Krishi Anusahdhan Patrika. 9: 113-116.
- Singh, D. P. et I'll. (1989). Indian J. Pulse Res. 2: 10-14.
- Singh, R. e.t I'll. (1995). Plant Dis. Res. 10: 41-43.
- Stonehouse. J. (1994). Plant Pathol. 43: 519-527.
- Stretton, H. M. etal. (1964). Phytopathology. 54: 1093-1095.
- Sugha, S. K..etal. (1989).lndianJ. Pl. Pathol. 7: 167-172.
- Sundar, S. and Dadan, D. S. (1993). Plant Dis. Res. 8: 11-18.
- Tachibana, H. etal. (1971). Phytopathology. 61: 1444-1446.
- Talboto, P. H. B. (1965). Persoonia. 3: 371- 406.
- Tiwari, T. N. (1993). Ph. D. Thesis, C.SA Univ. Agric. Tech. Kanpur. 103p.
- Uchida. J. Y. et aI. (1986). Mycologia. 78: 587 - 592.
- Ullstrup, A. J. (1939). Phytopathology. 29: 373-374.
- Verma, H.s. and Thapliyal, P.N. (1976). Indian Phytopathol. 29: 389·391.
- . Weber, G. F. (1939). Phytopi'lthology. 29: 559 - 575
- Weller, J.M. (1988). Ann. Rev. Phytopath. 26: 379-407.
- Wu, Lung-chi. and Lin, Vi- Shan. (1966). Mem. Coli. Agric. Natl. Taiwan Univ. 9: 57-69.
- Yang, X. B. et al. (1990). Phytopathology. 80: 386-392.
- Yang, X. B. etal. (1988). Plant Dis. 72: 644.
Disclaimer :
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Copyright :
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
In this Article
APC
APC cover the cost of turning a manuscript into a published manuscript through peer-review process, editorial work as well as the cost of hosting, distributing, indexing and promoting the manuscript.
Publish With US
Submit your manuscript through user friendly platform and acquire the maximum impact for your research by publishing with ARCC Journals.
Become a Reviewer/Member
Join our esteemed reviewers panel and become an editorial board member with international experts in the domain of numerous specializations.
Open Access
Filling the gap between research and communication ARCC provide Open Access of all journals which empower research community in all the ways which is accessible to all.
Products and Services
We provide prime quality of services to assist you select right product of your requirement.
Support and Policies
Finest policies are designed to ensure world class support to our authors, members and readers. Our efficient team provides best possible support for you.
Follow us
Published In
Agricultural Reviews