Agricultural Reviews

  • Chief EditorPradeep K. Sharma

  • Print ISSN 0253-1496

  • Online ISSN 0976-0741

  • NAAS Rating 4.84

Frequency :
Quarterly (March, June, September & December)
Indexing Services :
AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Reviews, volume 29 issue 3 (september 2008) : 193 - 199

IMPACT OF TRANSGENIC CROPS ON SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE- A REVIEW

Ganajaxi, S.I. Halikatti, P.Y. Kamannavar
1AICRP on MULLaRP, Main Agricultural Research Station University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad- 580 005, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Ganajaxi, Halikatti S.I., Kamannavar P.Y. (2024). IMPACT OF TRANSGENIC CROPS ON SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE- A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 29(3): 193 - 199. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The crop, which has got alien genes into its cells by recombination DNA technology, is called transgenic crop. These crops are used for many purposes: improve the quality of the agricultural or horticultural products; such as, tolerance to cold, frost, or drought, the resistance of plants to insects and diseases. Improving resistance to these diseases and insects also reduces the need of herbicides and pesticides. This makes the plants safer for the environment. In the future, transgenic crops may play the pivotal role for developing country with respect to food and nutritional security. Now, this is the only alternative available to cope up with the burgeoning population. The GM crops offer both challenges and opportunities for growth and development of mankind. These technologies should be used to complement the traditional methods for enhancing productivity and quality rather than to replace the conventional methods.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Awasthi, M.D., (1998). In Pesticides, Man and Biosphere . pp 121-160.
    2. Bambawale, et al.,(2004) .Curr. Sci. 86 (12) : 1628-33
    3. Bhatia and Mitra (2004).Curr. Sci. 86 (1). 138-140.
    4. Burmmel D.A. and Harpster M.H. (2001). Plant mol. Biol. 47: 311-340
    5. Carrington C. M. S., et al., (1993). Plant Physiol, 103 :429-434.
    6. Chackko,G.,(1999).The Hindu 4 Feb:26
    7. Chakraborty et al.,(2000). Ibid.97: 3724-29
    8. Chandra, A. and Pental, D. (2003). Curr. Sci. 84(3): 381-387.
    9. Crawley, M.J., S, et al., (2001). Nature, 409.
    10. Crawley, M.J., et al., (1993). Nature, 363: 620-623.
    11. Dale, P.J.(2003). J. Animal Sci. 79: 144-147
    12. Deswal. R. et al.,.(2001). Eur. J. Biochem. 267 3181-3188.
    13. Dhandapans, et al., (2004) Curr. Sci. 86 (12): 1628-1633
    14. Edward, G.P.J. and Ambrose, D.P.(1999). Indian J Environ. Tox. 9(2): 78-80.
    15. Ghosh, S.K.(2001).Curr. Sci. 81(6): 655-660.
    16. Grover, A., et al.,, (2003). Curr. Sci. 84(3): 355-367.
    17. Gupta Y.P.(2001). Sci. Reports, 38: 14-15.
    18. Gupta, S.K. and Deshpande, R.D.(2004). Curr. Sci. 86(9): 1216-1223.
    19. Hamilton A .J., et al., (1990). Nature , 346: 284-287.
    20. Hoffmann, M.P., et al., (1992). J Econ. Ent. 85: 2516-2522.
    21. Hall L .N., et al., (1993). Plant J . 3 :121-129.
    22. Jain . R.K. N. et al., (2003). Indian J. Biothech. Bilthechnol. Dev. Monit. 35 : 9-12
    23. James, C. (1998). Biotech. Dev.Monit. 35:9-12
    24. James, C., (2000). ISAAA Briefs, Ithaca, New yark No. 21
    25. James Clive, (2003). Curr. Sci. 84(3): 303-307.
    26. Losey, J.E., L.S. Rayor, M.E. Carten, (1999) Nature, 399: 214.
    27. Keen, N.T.(1992). Plant mol. Bio. 19: 109-122.
    28. Khadi, B.M., et al.,(2002). Proceedings of National Seminar on Bt Cotton Scenario with special reference to India, pp 1-25.
    29. Kumar. S. V., and Rajam. M.V. (2004). Indian J.Biotech.3: 299-304
    30. Krattiger, A.F.(1997). ISAAA Briefs. 2 : 42
    31. Nolan, B.T., et al., (1997). Enviro. Sci. Tech. 31: 2229-36.
    32. Oeller P. W. et al., (1991). Tecologis A.Science. 254 : 437-439.
    33. Parthsarathy, R. and Arthanari, M.P., (2001) Kissan World, 28(8): 9
    34. Pandey S. et al., (2000). Rev 19. 291-310.
    35. Pental Deepak, (2003). Curr. Sci. 84(3): 413-424.
    36. Picton,S. et al., (1995).Euphytica, 85:193-202
    37. Rai,B. (2002). Kissan World. 29(2):12-13
    38. Raina,A and Datta,A. (1992).Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA.89:11774-11778
    39. Sahai S. (2003). Curr. Sci. 84: 974-925.
    40. Sankaram,A. (1999). Curr. Sci. 77(1) : 26-29
    41. Sharma, H.C. and Rodomiro Ortiz, (2000). Curr. Sci. 79(4): 421-437.
    42. Sharma. P. and Rajam. M. V. J. (1995). Plant Bot. 46.135-141.
    43. Sheehy. R.E. et al., (1988). Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. UAS. 85 :8805-8809.
    44. Swaminathan, M.S., (2001), Curr. Sci. 81(8): 948-954.
    45. Taj, G., et al.,.(2004). J. Biotech. 3: 291-298.
    46. Timan D.M. et al., (1992). Plant Cell. 4: 667-679.
    47. Veena. et al., (1999). Plant J. 17. 385-395.
    48. Watson C. F. et al., (1994). Plant Cell, 6: 1623-1634.
    49. Winicov, I . and Bastola, D. R. (1999). Plant Physiol. . 120 : 473-480.
    50. Yadav. J. S. and Rajam. M.V. (1998). Plant Physiol. 116: 617-625.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)