Published In
Agricultural Reviews
Article Metrics

0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
In this Article
APC
APC cover the cost of turning a manuscript into a published manuscript through peer-review process, editorial work as well as the cost of hosting, distributing, indexing and promoting the manuscript.
Publish With US
Submit your manuscript through user friendly platform and acquire the maximum impact for your research by publishing with ARCC Journals.
Become a Reviewer/Member
Join our esteemed reviewers panel and become an editorial board member with international experts in the domain of numerous specializations.
Open Access
Filling the gap between research and communication ARCC provide Open Access of all journals which empower research community in all the ways which is accessible to all.
Products and Services
We provide prime quality of services to assist you select right product of your requirement.
Support and Policies
Finest policies are designed to ensure world class support to our authors, members and readers. Our efficient team provides best possible support for you.
Follow us
volume 31 issue 4 (december 2010) : 286 - 291
INTERCROPPING OF MAIZE AND FRENCH BEAN- A REVIEW
1Department of Agronomy
University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad-580 005, India
ABSTRACT
The basic concept of intercropping is that two or more crop species intercropped can exploit the
environment better than each of the component species grown separately. Intercropping of French
bean in maize did not affect the yield of maize significantly compared to sole maize. While French
bean yield was reduced significantly in intercropping. French bean had greater radiation use efficiency
in intercropping than in sole cropping. Here intercropping increased production per unit area per
unit time without affecting the production of main crop to a greater extent. All the maize/legume
intercroppings were having significantly higher LER (1.31 to 1.81), maize equivalent yield (67 to
140q/ha), net return (Rs10,000 to 17,000/ha) and B:C ratio than the sole maize
environment better than each of the component species grown separately. Intercropping of French
bean in maize did not affect the yield of maize significantly compared to sole maize. While French
bean yield was reduced significantly in intercropping. French bean had greater radiation use efficiency
in intercropping than in sole cropping. Here intercropping increased production per unit area per
unit time without affecting the production of main crop to a greater extent. All the maize/legume
intercroppings were having significantly higher LER (1.31 to 1.81), maize equivalent yield (67 to
140q/ha), net return (Rs10,000 to 17,000/ha) and B:C ratio than the sole maize
KEYWORDS
REFERENCES
- Ahlawat, I.P.S. (1998). Indian J. Agron., 43 (1): 45-49.
- Ali, M.(2002). Annual Report (2002), Directorate of Pulses Research, IIPR, Kanpur
- Ali, M. and Kushawaha, B. L. (1987). Indian Farming, 37 (2): 20-23.
- Balyan, J.S. (1997).Indian J. Agron., 42 (1): 26-28.
- Bharati, V. et al. (2007). Indian J. Agron., 52 (1): 27-30.
- Bhopalsingh and Awasthi, O. P. (1987). Agric. Sci. Digest, 7: 181-184.
- Bindra, A.D. and Thakur, V.S. (2005). Indian J. Agric.Sci., 75 : 488-89.
- Birabal Sahu. (2006). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 76 : 554-556.
- Vol. 31, No. 4, 2010 291
- Candal Neto, S.F. et al.,(1993). Revista ceres., 40: 281-287.
- Chandel, A. S., et al., (1993). Indian J. Agric Sci., 63: 220-224.
- Chui, J. N.(1988). East African Agric.For. J., 53: 93-104.
- Clement, A., et al., (1992). Canadian J. Pl. Sci., 71: 69-82.
- Donald, C. M., (1961). Symposium Special Experiment Biology, 15: 282-313.
- Donald, C. M., (1963). Adv. Agron., 15:1-118.
- Dua, V. K., et al., (2005). Indian J. Agril. Sci., 75 : 321-323.
- Faris, M. A., et al.,(1983). Exp. Agric., 19: 251-261.
- Flesch, R. D., (2002). Pesquise Agropecuaria Brasileria, 37: 51-56.
- Gardiner, T. R. and Cracker, L. L., (1983). Field Crop Res., 4: 313-320.
- Gollar, R. G. and Patil, V. C., (1997). Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 10: 648-652.
- Lakhani, D. A., (1976) Ph. D. Thesis, Reading University, England.
- Mahajan, V. and Singh, B., (1998). Crop Improv., 25: 96-100.
- Maitra, S., et al., (2001). Indian Agriculturist, 45 (3): 157-162.
- Mandal, M.R.I., et al., (1998). Bangladesh J. Bot. 27: 37-42.
- Marin, C. D., et al.,(1998) Revistade la Facultad de Agronomia, 15: 297-311.
- Mohan, H.M. (2003). M.Sc.(Agri.) Thesis,Uni.Agric Sci.,Dharwad, Karnataka.
- Naik, L. B. and Singh, R.V., (1992). Fertil. News, 37: 45-47.
- Oljaca, S., et al., (2000). J. Agric. Sci., 135: 261-270.
- Padhi, A. K.,( 2001). Indian J. Agron., 46: 204-210.
- Pandey, A. K., et al., (1999). Ann. Agric. Res., 20: 354-359.
- Pereirafitho, et al., (2000). Pesquisa Agropernaria Brasilira, 35: 5.
- Pilbeam, C.J., et al.,(1994). J. Agric. Sci., 123: 191-98.
- Rana, et al., 2001, Indian J. Agric. Res., 35: 100-103.
- Raposo-Ta-De, et al., (1995). Perquisa Agropelnania Brasipweria, 30:639-647.
- Reddy, M. S et al.,(1980). Proc.Inter. Workshop on Groundnut, India, 13-17, October, pp.133-142.
- Rezende, G. D. S. P., et al, (1990). Documentos, Empress Capixaba de Pesquisa
- Agropecuaria, No. 65, 120.
- Salomon, E., (1990). Working paper, International Rural Development Center, Swedish
- University of Agricultural Sciences, p. 35.
- Scarle, P. G. E., et al.,(1981). Field Crop Res., 4: 133-145.
- Shah, M. H., et al., (1991). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 36: 23-28.
- Sharma, A., et al., (2006). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 76 : 29-32.
- Sharma, R. A., et al.,(1994). J. Oilseed Res., 11 : 217-221.
- Shivay, Y. S., et al.,(1999). Indian J. Agron., 44: 261-266.
- Singh, G. and Singh, O.P., (1993). Indian J.Agron., 38: 519-22.
- Sinha, K. K., et al.,(1999) Indian J. Agron, 44 : 30-35.
- Sivakumar, M. V. K and Virmani, S. M., (1980).Expt. Agric., 16: 377-386.
- Trenbath,B.R., (1979). Proc. Inter. Workshop on Intercropping, ICRISAT,
- Hyderabad, pp. 141-154.
- Tsubo, M. and Walker, S., (2002). Agric For. Met., 110: 203-215.
- Vedprakash., et al., (2005), Indian J. Agric. Sci., 75 (12): 794-796.
- Willey, R.W. and Roberts, S.M., (1976).Solar Energy Society Conference Proceedings.
- Willey, R. W., (1979). Field Crop Abstracts, 32 (1): 1-10, 73-85
Disclaimer :
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Copyright :
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
In this Article
APC
APC cover the cost of turning a manuscript into a published manuscript through peer-review process, editorial work as well as the cost of hosting, distributing, indexing and promoting the manuscript.
Publish With US
Submit your manuscript through user friendly platform and acquire the maximum impact for your research by publishing with ARCC Journals.
Become a Reviewer/Member
Join our esteemed reviewers panel and become an editorial board member with international experts in the domain of numerous specializations.
Open Access
Filling the gap between research and communication ARCC provide Open Access of all journals which empower research community in all the ways which is accessible to all.
Products and Services
We provide prime quality of services to assist you select right product of your requirement.
Support and Policies
Finest policies are designed to ensure world class support to our authors, members and readers. Our efficient team provides best possible support for you.
Follow us
Published In
Agricultural Reviews