Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 31 issue 3 (september 2010) : 210 - 216

RESPONSE OF YIELD AND YIELD ATTRIBUTES OF GROUNDNUT TO MOISTURE STRESS - A REVIEW

G
G. Thiyagarajan
D
D. Rajakumar
R
R. Kumaraperumal*
M
M. Manikandan
1Water Technology Centre Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore – 641 003, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Thiyagarajan G., Rajakumar D., Kumaraperumal* R., Manikandan M. (2025). RESPONSE OF YIELD AND YIELD ATTRIBUTES OF GROUNDNUT TO MOISTURE STRESS - A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 31(3): 210 - 216. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Groundnut is an important oilseed crop in India and is commonly called as poor man’s nut.
India ranks first in acreage and a production of 7.21 M t. The average productivity in India is
1125 kg ha-1 which is less than the world’s average. The reduction in productivity and production
is due to the fact mostly the crop is raised in rainfed conditions. The effect of moisture stress on
yield and yield attributes plays a important role in increasing the production and productivity

REFERENCES

  1. Ahmad, A. (1999). In: Crop Yield Response to Deficit Irrigation, [Kirda C., Montonnet P., Hera C., Nielsen D.R. (eds.)]
  2. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 128-147.
  3. Allen, L.H. et al. (1976). Annals of Plant Physiology, 5 (2): 202-212.
  4. Arjunan, A. et al. (1988). Madras Agricultural Journal, 75 (1-2): 5-8.
  5. Bailey, E. and Biosvert, R.N. (1991). Journal of Production Agriculture, 4 (1): 1-9.
  6. Bennett, J.M. et al. (1990). Peanut Science, 17: 68-72.
  7. Bhaskara Reddy, G. et al. (1980). Agricultural Water Management, 3 (1): 45-51.
  8. Boote, K.J. and Ketring, D.L. (1990). Stewart Irrigation of Agricultural Crops, B.A. and Nielson D.R. (eds.), ASACSSA-
  9. SSSA, Madison, pp. 114-137.
  10. Boote, K.J. and Hammond, L.C. (1981). In: Proceedings of American Peanut Research and Education Society, 13: 86-92.
  11. Boote, K.J. et al. (1982). In: Peanut Science and Technology, (Harold E. Patee and Clyde T. young, Ed.) Am. Peanut
  12. Res. and Eol. Soc. Yoakum, Texas. pp. 163-203.
  13. Boote, K.J. et al. (1992). In: Nigam S.N. (ed.), Groundnut – A perspective. International crops Research Institute for the
  14. Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, India, pp. 331-343.
  15. Boote, K.J. et al. (2003). Agronomy Journal, 95: 32-51.
  16. Boote, K.J. et al. (1976). In: Proceedings of Soil Crop Science Society, 35: 47-50.
  17. Chavan, A.A. et al. (1992). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 62: 376-381.
  18. Cheema, S.S. et al. (1977). Journal of Research (Punjab), 14: 9-14.
  19. Dusek, D.A. et al. (1971). Field Crop Abstracts, 26: 4-7.
  20. Galbiatti, J.A. et al. (1995). Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasil, 30 (2): 195-200.
  21. Geethalakshmi, V. et al. (1994). Madras Agricultural Journal, 81 (8): 452-453.
  22. Ghadekar, S.R. et al. (1993). Journal of Soils Crops, 3 (2): 121-124.
  23. Gowda, A. and Hedge, B.R. (1986). Madras Agricultural Journal, 73 (2): 82-86.
  24. Harris, D. et al. (1988). Experimental Agriculture, 24: 215-226.
  25. Janamatti, V.S. et al. (1986). Narendra Deva Journal of Agricultural Research, 1 (2): 136-142.
  26. Jayarami Reddy, A. and Rao, I.M. (1968). Andhra Agricultural Journal, 15: 123-127.
  27. Kachroo, D. and Walia, A.S. (1991). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 36: 304-305.
  28. Khan, A.R. and Datta, B. (1982). Peanut Science, 9: 10-13.
  29. Kulkarni, J.H. et al. (1988). Oleagineux, 43 (11): 415-419.
  30. Lamm, F.R. et al. (1994). Transactions of American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 37 (5): 1491-1497.
  31. Madhusudhana Rao, D.V. et al. (1988). Andhra Agricultural Journal, 35: 23-25.
  32. Meisner, C.A. and Karnok, K.J. (1992). Agronomy Journal, 84 (2): 159-165.
  33. Mishra, C.M. (1997). Madras Agricultural Journal, 84 (2): 113-114.
  34. Nageswara Rao, R.C. et al. (1985). Agronomy Journal, 77: 782-786.
  35. Narang, R.S. and Gill, M.S. (1998). Fertilizer News, 43 (3): 57-67.
  36. 216 AGRICULTURAL REVIEWS
  37. Nautiyal, P.C. et al. (1991). Oleagineux, 46 (4): 153-158.
  38. Nautiyal, P.C. et al. (2001). FAO Water Report, 22: 39-47.
  39. Naveen, P. et al. (1992). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 37 (1): 82-85.
  40. Ndunguru, B.J. et al. (1993). In: Proceedings of the third ICRISAT regional groundnut meeting for West Africa,
  41. Dvagadougou, Burkina Faso: 35-40.
  42. Nimbalkar, V.S. et al. (1987). Current Research Report of Mahatma Phule Agriculture University, 3 (1): 73-74.
  43. Ochos, R. and Wormer, T.M.H. (1959). Oleagineux, 14: 281-291.
  44. Ono, Y. et al. (1974). In: Proceedings of Crop Science Society of Japan, 43: 247-251.
  45. Pal, T.K. et al. (1996). Indian Agriculture, 40 (3): 213-218.
  46. Pallas, J.E. et al. (1977). Agronomy Journal, 69: 381-383.
  47. Pandey, R.K. et al. (1984). Agronomy Journal, 76: 559-563.
  48. Patel, K.R. et al. (1995). International Arachis News letter, 15: 73-95.
  49. Patel, M.S. and Golakiya, B.A. (1988). Indian Journal Agricultural Science, 58 (9): 701-703.
  50. Pathak, S.R. et al. (1988). Legume Research, 11: 193-195.
  51. Patra, A.K. et al. (1999). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 44 (4): 800-804.
  52. Ramachandrappa, B.K and Kulkarni, K.R. (1992). Journal of Oil Seeds Research, 9: 51-58.
  53. Ramana Rao, D.V. (1994). M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University, Hyderabad.
  54. Ramesh Babu, V. et al. (1984). Annals of Arid Zone, 23: 259-260.
  55. Rami Reddy, S. et al. (1980). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 25: 571-576.
  56. Rami Reddy, S. et al. (1982). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 27 (4): 317-322.
  57. Rangaraju, G. and Iruthayaraj, M.R. (1995). Indian Journal Dryland Agricultural Research and Development, 10 (2):
  58. 202-205.
  59. Rao, R.C.N. et al. (1988). Agronomy Journal, 80 (3): 431-438.
  60. Reddy, R. C. and Reddy, S.R. (1993). Agricultural Water Management, 23: 1-9.
  61. Samsukumar, B. (1991). M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University, Hyderabad.
  62. Sharma, P.S. and Sivakumar, M.V.K. (1991). Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 34 (2): 147-152.
  63. Sexton, P.J. et al. (1997). Peanut Science, 24: 19-24.
  64. Sharma, K. and Singh, G. (1987). Environmental Ecology, 5 (4): 647-650.
  65. Shashikumar, M.R. et al. (1988). Narendra Deva Journal of Agricultural Research, 3 (1): 48-54.
  66. Shinde, G.G. and Pawar, K.R. (1984). Journal of Maharashtra Agricultural Universities, 9: 26-28.
  67. Singh, A.L. et al. (1995). Agrochimica, 39 (4): 184-198.
  68. Sinha, S.K. and Renu, K. (1975). Advances in agronomy, 27: 123-170.
  69. Skelton, B.J. and Shear, G.M. (1971). Agronomy Journal, 63: 409-412.
  70. Stirling, C.M. and Black, C.R. (1991). Tropical Agriculture, 68 (3): 296-300.
  71. Subbaiah, S.V. et al. (1974). Journal of Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University Research, 2 (1): 24-28.
  72. Suther, D.M. and Patel, M.S. (1992). Journal of Indian Society of Soil Science, 40 (3): 594-596.
  73. Tiwari, R.B. and Dhakar, L.L. (1997). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 41 (3): 72-76.
  74. Underwood, C.V. et al. (1971). Agronomy Journal, 71: 853-858.
  75. Velu, G. and Gopalakrishnan, S. (1988). Madras Agricultural Journal, 75 (1-2): 64-66.
  76. Venkateswara Rao, P. et al. (1986). The Andhra Agricultural Journal, 33: 48-52.
  77. Watterott, J. (1991). Ph.D. Thesis, Rheinischen Friedrich Wilhelms-Universitatm Bonn, Germany.
  78. Wright, D.C. et al. (1994). Crop Science, 34 (1): 92-97.
  79. Wright, G.C. and Bell, M.J. (2005). Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 52 (2): 197-203.
  80. Wright, G.C. et al. (1991). Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 42 (3): 453-470.
  81. Wright, G.C. et al. (1993). Physiological Ecology, 20: 247-267
Published In
Agricultural Reviews
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    volume 31 issue 3 (september 2010) : 210 - 216

    RESPONSE OF YIELD AND YIELD ATTRIBUTES OF GROUNDNUT TO MOISTURE STRESS - A REVIEW

    G
    G. Thiyagarajan
    D
    D. Rajakumar
    R
    R. Kumaraperumal*
    M
    M. Manikandan
    1Water Technology Centre Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore – 641 003, India

    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- Thiyagarajan G., Rajakumar D., Kumaraperumal* R., Manikandan M. (2025). RESPONSE OF YIELD AND YIELD ATTRIBUTES OF GROUNDNUT TO MOISTURE STRESS - A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 31(3): 210 - 216. doi: .

    ABSTRACT

    Groundnut is an important oilseed crop in India and is commonly called as poor man’s nut.
    India ranks first in acreage and a production of 7.21 M t. The average productivity in India is
    1125 kg ha-1 which is less than the world’s average. The reduction in productivity and production
    is due to the fact mostly the crop is raised in rainfed conditions. The effect of moisture stress on
    yield and yield attributes plays a important role in increasing the production and productivity

    REFERENCES

    1. Ahmad, A. (1999). In: Crop Yield Response to Deficit Irrigation, [Kirda C., Montonnet P., Hera C., Nielsen D.R. (eds.)]
    2. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 128-147.
    3. Allen, L.H. et al. (1976). Annals of Plant Physiology, 5 (2): 202-212.
    4. Arjunan, A. et al. (1988). Madras Agricultural Journal, 75 (1-2): 5-8.
    5. Bailey, E. and Biosvert, R.N. (1991). Journal of Production Agriculture, 4 (1): 1-9.
    6. Bennett, J.M. et al. (1990). Peanut Science, 17: 68-72.
    7. Bhaskara Reddy, G. et al. (1980). Agricultural Water Management, 3 (1): 45-51.
    8. Boote, K.J. and Ketring, D.L. (1990). Stewart Irrigation of Agricultural Crops, B.A. and Nielson D.R. (eds.), ASACSSA-
    9. SSSA, Madison, pp. 114-137.
    10. Boote, K.J. and Hammond, L.C. (1981). In: Proceedings of American Peanut Research and Education Society, 13: 86-92.
    11. Boote, K.J. et al. (1982). In: Peanut Science and Technology, (Harold E. Patee and Clyde T. young, Ed.) Am. Peanut
    12. Res. and Eol. Soc. Yoakum, Texas. pp. 163-203.
    13. Boote, K.J. et al. (1992). In: Nigam S.N. (ed.), Groundnut – A perspective. International crops Research Institute for the
    14. Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, India, pp. 331-343.
    15. Boote, K.J. et al. (2003). Agronomy Journal, 95: 32-51.
    16. Boote, K.J. et al. (1976). In: Proceedings of Soil Crop Science Society, 35: 47-50.
    17. Chavan, A.A. et al. (1992). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 62: 376-381.
    18. Cheema, S.S. et al. (1977). Journal of Research (Punjab), 14: 9-14.
    19. Dusek, D.A. et al. (1971). Field Crop Abstracts, 26: 4-7.
    20. Galbiatti, J.A. et al. (1995). Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasil, 30 (2): 195-200.
    21. Geethalakshmi, V. et al. (1994). Madras Agricultural Journal, 81 (8): 452-453.
    22. Ghadekar, S.R. et al. (1993). Journal of Soils Crops, 3 (2): 121-124.
    23. Gowda, A. and Hedge, B.R. (1986). Madras Agricultural Journal, 73 (2): 82-86.
    24. Harris, D. et al. (1988). Experimental Agriculture, 24: 215-226.
    25. Janamatti, V.S. et al. (1986). Narendra Deva Journal of Agricultural Research, 1 (2): 136-142.
    26. Jayarami Reddy, A. and Rao, I.M. (1968). Andhra Agricultural Journal, 15: 123-127.
    27. Kachroo, D. and Walia, A.S. (1991). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 36: 304-305.
    28. Khan, A.R. and Datta, B. (1982). Peanut Science, 9: 10-13.
    29. Kulkarni, J.H. et al. (1988). Oleagineux, 43 (11): 415-419.
    30. Lamm, F.R. et al. (1994). Transactions of American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 37 (5): 1491-1497.
    31. Madhusudhana Rao, D.V. et al. (1988). Andhra Agricultural Journal, 35: 23-25.
    32. Meisner, C.A. and Karnok, K.J. (1992). Agronomy Journal, 84 (2): 159-165.
    33. Mishra, C.M. (1997). Madras Agricultural Journal, 84 (2): 113-114.
    34. Nageswara Rao, R.C. et al. (1985). Agronomy Journal, 77: 782-786.
    35. Narang, R.S. and Gill, M.S. (1998). Fertilizer News, 43 (3): 57-67.
    36. 216 AGRICULTURAL REVIEWS
    37. Nautiyal, P.C. et al. (1991). Oleagineux, 46 (4): 153-158.
    38. Nautiyal, P.C. et al. (2001). FAO Water Report, 22: 39-47.
    39. Naveen, P. et al. (1992). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 37 (1): 82-85.
    40. Ndunguru, B.J. et al. (1993). In: Proceedings of the third ICRISAT regional groundnut meeting for West Africa,
    41. Dvagadougou, Burkina Faso: 35-40.
    42. Nimbalkar, V.S. et al. (1987). Current Research Report of Mahatma Phule Agriculture University, 3 (1): 73-74.
    43. Ochos, R. and Wormer, T.M.H. (1959). Oleagineux, 14: 281-291.
    44. Ono, Y. et al. (1974). In: Proceedings of Crop Science Society of Japan, 43: 247-251.
    45. Pal, T.K. et al. (1996). Indian Agriculture, 40 (3): 213-218.
    46. Pallas, J.E. et al. (1977). Agronomy Journal, 69: 381-383.
    47. Pandey, R.K. et al. (1984). Agronomy Journal, 76: 559-563.
    48. Patel, K.R. et al. (1995). International Arachis News letter, 15: 73-95.
    49. Patel, M.S. and Golakiya, B.A. (1988). Indian Journal Agricultural Science, 58 (9): 701-703.
    50. Pathak, S.R. et al. (1988). Legume Research, 11: 193-195.
    51. Patra, A.K. et al. (1999). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 44 (4): 800-804.
    52. Ramachandrappa, B.K and Kulkarni, K.R. (1992). Journal of Oil Seeds Research, 9: 51-58.
    53. Ramana Rao, D.V. (1994). M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University, Hyderabad.
    54. Ramesh Babu, V. et al. (1984). Annals of Arid Zone, 23: 259-260.
    55. Rami Reddy, S. et al. (1980). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 25: 571-576.
    56. Rami Reddy, S. et al. (1982). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 27 (4): 317-322.
    57. Rangaraju, G. and Iruthayaraj, M.R. (1995). Indian Journal Dryland Agricultural Research and Development, 10 (2):
    58. 202-205.
    59. Rao, R.C.N. et al. (1988). Agronomy Journal, 80 (3): 431-438.
    60. Reddy, R. C. and Reddy, S.R. (1993). Agricultural Water Management, 23: 1-9.
    61. Samsukumar, B. (1991). M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University, Hyderabad.
    62. Sharma, P.S. and Sivakumar, M.V.K. (1991). Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 34 (2): 147-152.
    63. Sexton, P.J. et al. (1997). Peanut Science, 24: 19-24.
    64. Sharma, K. and Singh, G. (1987). Environmental Ecology, 5 (4): 647-650.
    65. Shashikumar, M.R. et al. (1988). Narendra Deva Journal of Agricultural Research, 3 (1): 48-54.
    66. Shinde, G.G. and Pawar, K.R. (1984). Journal of Maharashtra Agricultural Universities, 9: 26-28.
    67. Singh, A.L. et al. (1995). Agrochimica, 39 (4): 184-198.
    68. Sinha, S.K. and Renu, K. (1975). Advances in agronomy, 27: 123-170.
    69. Skelton, B.J. and Shear, G.M. (1971). Agronomy Journal, 63: 409-412.
    70. Stirling, C.M. and Black, C.R. (1991). Tropical Agriculture, 68 (3): 296-300.
    71. Subbaiah, S.V. et al. (1974). Journal of Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University Research, 2 (1): 24-28.
    72. Suther, D.M. and Patel, M.S. (1992). Journal of Indian Society of Soil Science, 40 (3): 594-596.
    73. Tiwari, R.B. and Dhakar, L.L. (1997). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 41 (3): 72-76.
    74. Underwood, C.V. et al. (1971). Agronomy Journal, 71: 853-858.
    75. Velu, G. and Gopalakrishnan, S. (1988). Madras Agricultural Journal, 75 (1-2): 64-66.
    76. Venkateswara Rao, P. et al. (1986). The Andhra Agricultural Journal, 33: 48-52.
    77. Watterott, J. (1991). Ph.D. Thesis, Rheinischen Friedrich Wilhelms-Universitatm Bonn, Germany.
    78. Wright, D.C. et al. (1994). Crop Science, 34 (1): 92-97.
    79. Wright, G.C. and Bell, M.J. (2005). Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 52 (2): 197-203.
    80. Wright, G.C. et al. (1991). Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 42 (3): 453-470.
    81. Wright, G.C. et al. (1993). Physiological Ecology, 20: 247-267
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Agricultural Reviews

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)