Published In
Agricultural Reviews
Article Metrics

0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
In this Article
APC
APC cover the cost of turning a manuscript into a published manuscript through peer-review process, editorial work as well as the cost of hosting, distributing, indexing and promoting the manuscript.
Publish With US
Submit your manuscript through user friendly platform and acquire the maximum impact for your research by publishing with ARCC Journals.
Become a Reviewer/Member
Join our esteemed reviewers panel and become an editorial board member with international experts in the domain of numerous specializations.
Open Access
Filling the gap between research and communication ARCC provide Open Access of all journals which empower research community in all the ways which is accessible to all.
Products and Services
We provide prime quality of services to assist you select right product of your requirement.
Support and Policies
Finest policies are designed to ensure world class support to our authors, members and readers. Our efficient team provides best possible support for you.
Follow us
volume 31 issue 3 (september 2010) : 172 -183
PRODUCTION OF VERMICOMPOST FROM AGRICULTURAL WASTES- A REVIEW
1Department of Agronomy, Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology,
Bhubaneswar 751 003, India
ABSTRACT
A cris-cross review on vermicompost from agricultural wastes reveals that C-N ratio, pH, moisture
content and temperature of the substrates are the most important parameters for proper
vermicomposting as they determine the litter palatability in detrivorus earthworms. Feed material
having C-N ratio less than 40 can be used successfully for vermicomposting. A temperature of 18 to
250C and moisture content of 40 to 60% were most congenial. Substrate treatment by bioinoculants
and or addition of rock phosphate enriches the vermicompost through increase in the total nitrogen
and available phosphorus and potassium content of vermicompost. Vermicompost prepared out of
the mixture of crop residues amended with cow-dung in the ratio of 1:1 also exhibits higher nutrient
content. Mixed culture of Eisenia foetida, Eudrilus eugeniae and Perionyx excavatus in
vermicomposting shows higher multiplication rate of the worms. Cow-dung has widely been accepted
as the best substrate provided its pH is below 9.5. Cereal and leguminous wastes, tree leaves and
weeds are also found suitable while fresh poultry and pig manure and glyricidia stems are unsuitable.
Vermicompost from obnoxious weeds like Eichhornia crassipes, Salvinia molesta, Lantana camara,
Trapa sp. can be prepared with in 6 to 7 weeks with recovery of about 50 to 53%. Substrates containing
1 to 5% green leaves of leguminous trees can be suitably used for vermicomposting but poisonous
plants or plants sprayed with insecticides are always fatal to the earthworms. Overall high rate of
growth and reproduction of earthworms in the substrates are the best indicators of effective
vermicomposting. Storage of vermicompost beyond 10 weeks decreases the microbial biomass, plant
hormone concentration and enzyme activity.
content and temperature of the substrates are the most important parameters for proper
vermicomposting as they determine the litter palatability in detrivorus earthworms. Feed material
having C-N ratio less than 40 can be used successfully for vermicomposting. A temperature of 18 to
250C and moisture content of 40 to 60% were most congenial. Substrate treatment by bioinoculants
and or addition of rock phosphate enriches the vermicompost through increase in the total nitrogen
and available phosphorus and potassium content of vermicompost. Vermicompost prepared out of
the mixture of crop residues amended with cow-dung in the ratio of 1:1 also exhibits higher nutrient
content. Mixed culture of Eisenia foetida, Eudrilus eugeniae and Perionyx excavatus in
vermicomposting shows higher multiplication rate of the worms. Cow-dung has widely been accepted
as the best substrate provided its pH is below 9.5. Cereal and leguminous wastes, tree leaves and
weeds are also found suitable while fresh poultry and pig manure and glyricidia stems are unsuitable.
Vermicompost from obnoxious weeds like Eichhornia crassipes, Salvinia molesta, Lantana camara,
Trapa sp. can be prepared with in 6 to 7 weeks with recovery of about 50 to 53%. Substrates containing
1 to 5% green leaves of leguminous trees can be suitably used for vermicomposting but poisonous
plants or plants sprayed with insecticides are always fatal to the earthworms. Overall high rate of
growth and reproduction of earthworms in the substrates are the best indicators of effective
vermicomposting. Storage of vermicompost beyond 10 weeks decreases the microbial biomass, plant
hormone concentration and enzyme activity.
REFERENCES
- Abraham, C. T et. al. (2005). Indian J. Weed Sci., 37: 155-156.
- Aira, M. et. al. (2007). J. Environ. Qual., 36: 448-452.
- Anonymous. (2002). In: Package of Practices Recommendations: Crops. 12th edition, Edited by Jose, A.I., Paulose, S.,
- Prameela, P. and Bonny, B.P. Published by Director of Extension, Kerala Agriculture University. 278 pp.
- Anonymous. (2004). In: Proceedings of 6th IFOAM-Asia Scientific Conference “Benign Environment and Safe Food”,
- held at Yangpyung, Korea during 7–11 September, 2004.
- Aquino, A. M. et. al. (1994). Pesqui. Agropec. Bras., 29: 161–168.
- Aranda, E. et. al. (1999). In: Earthworm Management in Tropical Agroecosystems (Lavelle, P., Brussaard, L. and
- Hendrix, P. eds). CAB International, UK, 253-288.
- Atiyeh, R. M., et. al. (2000). Pedobiologia, 44: 709–724.
- Bansal, S. and Kapoor, K. K. (2000). Bioresour. Technol., 73 : 95-98.
- Barik, T. et. al. (2005). J. Appl. Zool. Res, 16: 106-107.
- Bertoldi, M. et. al. (1984). In: Composting of Agricultural Wastes Gasser, J.K.R. (Ed) Elsavier, London, pp. 27-40.
- Biradar, A. P. and Patil, M. B. (2001). Indian J. Weed Sci., 33: 229-230.
- Chan, P. L. S. and Griffiths, D. A. (1988). The vermicomposting of pre-treated pig manure. Biol Wastes, 24: 57-69.
- Dominguez, J. et. al. (1997). Bio Cycle, 38: 57-59.
- Edwards, C. A. (1998). In: Earthworm Ecology, Ed. C.A. Edwards, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 327-354.
- Edwards, C. A. and Bohlen, P. J. (1996). Biology and Ecology of Earthworms. 3rd Ed., Chapman and Hall, London.
- Edwards, C. A. and Burrows, I. (1988). SPB Academic Publishing; The Hague, The Netherlands.
- Eiland, F. et. al. (2001). Compost Sci. Util., 9: 186-197.
- Gajalakshmi, S. and Abbasi, S. A. (2004). Bioresou.r Technol., 92: 291-296.
- Gajalakshmi, S. et. al. (2001a). Bioresour. Technol., 76 : 177-181.
- Gajalakshmi, S. et. al. (2001b). Bioresour. Technol., 80: 131-135.
- 182 AGRICULTURAL REVIEWS
- Garg, P. et. al. (2006a). Bioresour. Technol., 97: 391-395.
- Garg, P. et. al. (2006b). In: Proceedings of the 2nd Joint International Conference on “Sustainable Energy and Environment
- (SEE 2006)” held at Bangkok, Thailand during 21-23 November, 2006.
- Garg, V. K. et. al. (2005). Appl. Ecol. Environ. Re.s 3: 51-59.
- Gaur, A. C., et. al. (1982). Agric. Wastes, 4: 453-460.
- Gitanjali, G. (2007). Agric. Sci. Digest, 27 : 270-271.
- Gunadi, B. and Edwards, C. A. (2003). Pedobiologia 47: 321–330.
- Hallatt, L. (1992). Soil Biol. Biochem., 24 (Special issue ISEE 4. Proceedings of the “4th International Symposium on
- Earthworm Ecology”, Ed. A. Kretzschmar, held at Avignon, France during June 11-15, 1990) : 1333-1340.
- Hendriksen, N. B. (1990). Biol. Fertility Soils 10: 17-21.
- Ismail, S. A. (1995). In: Organic Agriculture Ed. Thampan, P.K., Peekay Tree Crops Development Foundation,
- Chochin. pp. 77-100.
- Ismail, S. A. (1997). Orient Longman Limited, Chennai, pp. 92.
- Jeyabal, A. and Kuppuswamy, G. (2001). Eur. J. of Agron., 15: 153-170.
- Kale, R. D. (1986). J. Soil. Biol. Ecol., 6: 98-103.
- Kale, R. D. et. al. (1982). Pedobiologia, 23: 419–425.
- Khwairakpam, M. and Bhargava, R. (2007). In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Solid
- Waste Management, held at Chennai, India during 5 - 7 September 2007, pp. 282-288.
- Kumar,, a V. and Singh, K. P. (2001). Bioresour. Technol., 76: 173-175.
- Loh, T. C., et. al. (2005). Bioresour. Technol., 96 : 11–114.
- Manivannan, S., et. al. (2004). J. Exp. Zool., 7: 29-37.
- Mba, C. C. (1989). Rev. Biol. Trop., 37: 11-14.
- Mba, C. C. (1996). Resour. Conserv. Recycling, 17: 219–226.
- Mitchell, A. (1997). Soil. Biol. Biochem., 29: 763-766.
- Moreira, H. M., et. al. (1993). UNIMAR. Ciencias, 1: 48-51.
- Muyima, N. Y. O. et. al. (1994). Soil. Biol. Biochem., 26: 973-976.
- Nagavallemma, K. P. et. al. (2004). Global Theme on Agrecosystems Report No. 8. Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh,
- India, 20 pp.
- Nair, J. et. al. (2006). Bioresour. Technol., 97: 2091-2095.
- Palsania, J., et. al. (2008). Appl. Ecol. . Environ. Res., 6: 49-61.
- Pramanik, P. et. al. (2007). Bioresour. Technol., 98: 2485-2494.
- Raghavendra, Ali, et. al. (2001). Curr. Res., 30: 35-37.
- Ramalingam, R. (2001). J. Exp. Zool., 4: 267-272.
- Reinecke, A. J., et. al. (1992). Soil Biol. Biochem., 24: 1295-1307.
- Sailajakumari, M. S., and Ushakumari, K. (2002). J. Trop. Agric., 40: 27-30.
- Salkinkop, S. R., et. al. (2005). Monthly Magazine Published by Coffee Board, (May 2005) pp. 1.
- Shanthi, N. R., et. al. (1993). Compost Sci. Util., 1: 27-30.
- Sharma, S. and Vasudevan, P. (1999). In: Proceedings of the R´99 Congress (Recovery, Recycling, Re-integration),
- Vol. 31, No. 3, 2010 183
- held at Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi during February 1999.
- Sherman, R. (2003). Raising Earthworms Successfully. Publication Number: EBAE 103-83. North Carolina State
- University, Raleigh, NC. Published by North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, pp. 26.
- Singh, A. and Sharma, S. (2002). Biores. Technol., 85 : 107-111.
- Singh, N. B., et. al. (2005). Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res., 4: 85-97.
- Suthar, S. (2008). Ecolo. Eng., 32: 206-214.
- Tripathy, G. and Bharadwaj, P. (2005). J. Appl. Biol. Sci., 31: 150-159.
- Werner, M., and Cuevas, J. R. (1996). Bio Cycle, 37: 60-62.
- Wong, S. H. and Griffiths, D. A. (1991). World J. . Microbiol. . Biotechnol.,7: 593-595.
Disclaimer :
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Copyright :
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
In this Article
APC
APC cover the cost of turning a manuscript into a published manuscript through peer-review process, editorial work as well as the cost of hosting, distributing, indexing and promoting the manuscript.
Publish With US
Submit your manuscript through user friendly platform and acquire the maximum impact for your research by publishing with ARCC Journals.
Become a Reviewer/Member
Join our esteemed reviewers panel and become an editorial board member with international experts in the domain of numerous specializations.
Open Access
Filling the gap between research and communication ARCC provide Open Access of all journals which empower research community in all the ways which is accessible to all.
Products and Services
We provide prime quality of services to assist you select right product of your requirement.
Support and Policies
Finest policies are designed to ensure world class support to our authors, members and readers. Our efficient team provides best possible support for you.
Follow us
Published In
Agricultural Reviews