Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 31 issue 1 (march 2010) :

IN VITRO MUTATION IN HORTICULTURAL CROPS- A REVIEW

M
M. Velmurugan
*
* K. Rajamani
P
P. Paramaguru
R
R. Gnanam
J
J.R. Kannan Bapu
C
C. Harisudan
P
P. Hemalatha
1Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore- 641 003, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Velmurugan M., Rajamani K. *, Paramaguru P., Gnanam R., Bapu Kannan J.R., Harisudan C., Hemalatha P. (2025). IN VITRO MUTATION IN HORTICULTURAL CROPS- A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 31(1): . doi: .

ABSTRACT

In vitro mutation can create novel and unique variations when the natural variability does not
provide the genes for the desired trait. The creation of variability is the starting point in any breeding
programme of an agronomically accepted cultivar rather than a genetic stock of no direct commercial
value with many undesirable attributes. In in vitro mutation, the LD50 value for shoot tip explants
was 2.00 kR gamma rays and 750 mM EMS. Similarly, the LD50 value for callus culture was 1.0 kR
gamma rays and 200 mM EMS. The callus derived in vitro mutants exerted negative genotypic and
phenotypic correlation was expressed by forskolin content. The work on in vitro mutation in different
horticultural crops has been reviewed in this article

REFERENCES

  1. Ahloowalia, B.S. (1990). In: The Impact of Biotechnology in Agriculture, Kluwer, Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
  2. Arunyanart, S. and Soontronyatara, S. (2002). Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 70: 119-122.
  3. Bhagwat, B. and Duncan, E.J. (1998). Euphytica, 101: 143-150.
  4. Charbaji, T. and Nabulsi, I. (1999). Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 57: 129-132.
  5. Chopra, V. L. and Sharma, R. P. (1991). Curr. Sci., 60 (9&10): 543-547.
  6. Dao, T.B., et al (2006). Plant Mutation Rep., 1(2): 26-27.
  7. Datta, S.K., et al (2005). Curr. Sci., 88(1): 155-158.
  8. Ibrahim, R., et al (1998). Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 54: 37-44.
  9. Jerzy, M. and Lubomski, M. (1992). Acta Hort., 314: 269-274.
  10. Kathiresan, C. (2005). Ph.D., thesis submitted to Univ. of Agric. Sci., G.K.V.K. Campus, Bangalore.
  11. Khanuja, S. P. S., et al (1998). J. Medicinal Aromatic. Plant Sci., 20: 359-361.
  12. Klu, G. Y. P. (1993). Tropical Agric., 70(3): 289-290.
  13. Vol. 31, No. 1, 2010 67
  14. Kuksova, V.B., et al (1997). Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 49: 17-27.
  15. Kulkarni, V.M., et al (1997). J. Nucl. Agric. Biol., 26: 232-240.
  16. Kulkarni, V.M., et al (2004). Curr. Sci., 86(7): 902-904.
  17. Laneri, U., et al (1990). Acta Hort., 280: 395-402.
  18. Latado, R.R., et al (2004). Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 77: 103-106.
  19. Lee, Y., et al (2002). J. Plant Biotech., 4(4): 163-170.
  20. Malpathak, N.P. and David, S.B. (1990). Indian J. of Exp. Biol., 28: 519 – 521.
  21. Malpathak, N.P. and David, S.B. (1994). Indian Drugs, 31(2): 73-74.
  22. Maluszynski, M., et al (1995). Euphytica, 85: 303-315.
  23. Mandal, A.K.A., et al (2000 a). Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 60: 33-38.
  24. Mandal, A.K.A., et al (2000 b). Euphytica, 114: 9-12.
  25. Misra, P., et al (2004). Biologia Plantarum, 47 (1): 155-156.
  26. Nayak, S., et al (1997). Indian Perfumer, 41: 41-44.
  27. Nichterlein, K., et al (2000). In: Proc., DAE-BRNS Symposium on the Use of Nuclear and Molecular Techniques in Crop
  28. Improvement, B.A.R.C., Mumbai, India.
  29. Novak, F.J. (1991). In: Plant Mutation Breeding for Crop Improvement, Vol 2, IAEA, Vienna, pp. 327-342.
  30. Paramesh, T.H. and Chowdhury, S. (2005). J. Applied Hort., 7(1): 43-45.
  31. Prabhakaran, G. (2001). Ph.D., thesis submitted to Tamil Nadu Agril. Univ., Coimbatore.
  32. Predieri, S. (2001). Plant cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 64: 185-210.
  33. Predieri, S. and Zimmerman, R.H. (2001). Euphytica,117: 217-227.
  34. Ram, G., et al (1994). Indian J. Forestry, 17(1): 20-25.
  35. Safo-Kantanka, O. and Owusu-Nipah, J.(1993). J. Sci. Food. Agric., 60: 99-104.
  36. Shobhana, A. and Rajeevan, P. K. (2004). J. Ornamental Hort., 7(3-4): 87-91.
  37. Shobhana, A. and Rajeevan, P. K.(2003). J. Ornamental Hort., 6(1): 39-41.
  38. Shylaja, M. R. and Nair, G. S. (2003). In: National Seminar on New Perspectives in Spices, Medicinal and Aromatic
  39. Plants held at Goa, pp.18-22.
  40. Tejaswini, S. et al (2006). Indian J. Genet., 66(1): 71-72.
  41. Velmurugan, M. (2007). Ph.D. Thesis submitted to Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore.
  42. Velmurugan, M. et al (2008). In. Proc. National Conference on Modern Trends in Plant in vitro Biology.
  43. Bharathidasan University, Triuchirapalli, India.
  44. Walther, F. and Sauer, A. (1990). Plant Breed., 105: 137-143.
Published In
Agricultural Reviews
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    volume 31 issue 1 (march 2010) :

    IN VITRO MUTATION IN HORTICULTURAL CROPS- A REVIEW

    M
    M. Velmurugan
    *
    * K. Rajamani
    P
    P. Paramaguru
    R
    R. Gnanam
    J
    J.R. Kannan Bapu
    C
    C. Harisudan
    P
    P. Hemalatha
    1Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore- 641 003, India

    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- Velmurugan M., Rajamani K. *, Paramaguru P., Gnanam R., Bapu Kannan J.R., Harisudan C., Hemalatha P. (2025). IN VITRO MUTATION IN HORTICULTURAL CROPS- A REVIEW. Agricultural Reviews. 31(1): . doi: .

    ABSTRACT

    In vitro mutation can create novel and unique variations when the natural variability does not
    provide the genes for the desired trait. The creation of variability is the starting point in any breeding
    programme of an agronomically accepted cultivar rather than a genetic stock of no direct commercial
    value with many undesirable attributes. In in vitro mutation, the LD50 value for shoot tip explants
    was 2.00 kR gamma rays and 750 mM EMS. Similarly, the LD50 value for callus culture was 1.0 kR
    gamma rays and 200 mM EMS. The callus derived in vitro mutants exerted negative genotypic and
    phenotypic correlation was expressed by forskolin content. The work on in vitro mutation in different
    horticultural crops has been reviewed in this article

    REFERENCES

    1. Ahloowalia, B.S. (1990). In: The Impact of Biotechnology in Agriculture, Kluwer, Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
    2. Arunyanart, S. and Soontronyatara, S. (2002). Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 70: 119-122.
    3. Bhagwat, B. and Duncan, E.J. (1998). Euphytica, 101: 143-150.
    4. Charbaji, T. and Nabulsi, I. (1999). Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 57: 129-132.
    5. Chopra, V. L. and Sharma, R. P. (1991). Curr. Sci., 60 (9&10): 543-547.
    6. Dao, T.B., et al (2006). Plant Mutation Rep., 1(2): 26-27.
    7. Datta, S.K., et al (2005). Curr. Sci., 88(1): 155-158.
    8. Ibrahim, R., et al (1998). Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 54: 37-44.
    9. Jerzy, M. and Lubomski, M. (1992). Acta Hort., 314: 269-274.
    10. Kathiresan, C. (2005). Ph.D., thesis submitted to Univ. of Agric. Sci., G.K.V.K. Campus, Bangalore.
    11. Khanuja, S. P. S., et al (1998). J. Medicinal Aromatic. Plant Sci., 20: 359-361.
    12. Klu, G. Y. P. (1993). Tropical Agric., 70(3): 289-290.
    13. Vol. 31, No. 1, 2010 67
    14. Kuksova, V.B., et al (1997). Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 49: 17-27.
    15. Kulkarni, V.M., et al (1997). J. Nucl. Agric. Biol., 26: 232-240.
    16. Kulkarni, V.M., et al (2004). Curr. Sci., 86(7): 902-904.
    17. Laneri, U., et al (1990). Acta Hort., 280: 395-402.
    18. Latado, R.R., et al (2004). Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 77: 103-106.
    19. Lee, Y., et al (2002). J. Plant Biotech., 4(4): 163-170.
    20. Malpathak, N.P. and David, S.B. (1990). Indian J. of Exp. Biol., 28: 519 – 521.
    21. Malpathak, N.P. and David, S.B. (1994). Indian Drugs, 31(2): 73-74.
    22. Maluszynski, M., et al (1995). Euphytica, 85: 303-315.
    23. Mandal, A.K.A., et al (2000 a). Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 60: 33-38.
    24. Mandal, A.K.A., et al (2000 b). Euphytica, 114: 9-12.
    25. Misra, P., et al (2004). Biologia Plantarum, 47 (1): 155-156.
    26. Nayak, S., et al (1997). Indian Perfumer, 41: 41-44.
    27. Nichterlein, K., et al (2000). In: Proc., DAE-BRNS Symposium on the Use of Nuclear and Molecular Techniques in Crop
    28. Improvement, B.A.R.C., Mumbai, India.
    29. Novak, F.J. (1991). In: Plant Mutation Breeding for Crop Improvement, Vol 2, IAEA, Vienna, pp. 327-342.
    30. Paramesh, T.H. and Chowdhury, S. (2005). J. Applied Hort., 7(1): 43-45.
    31. Prabhakaran, G. (2001). Ph.D., thesis submitted to Tamil Nadu Agril. Univ., Coimbatore.
    32. Predieri, S. (2001). Plant cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 64: 185-210.
    33. Predieri, S. and Zimmerman, R.H. (2001). Euphytica,117: 217-227.
    34. Ram, G., et al (1994). Indian J. Forestry, 17(1): 20-25.
    35. Safo-Kantanka, O. and Owusu-Nipah, J.(1993). J. Sci. Food. Agric., 60: 99-104.
    36. Shobhana, A. and Rajeevan, P. K. (2004). J. Ornamental Hort., 7(3-4): 87-91.
    37. Shobhana, A. and Rajeevan, P. K.(2003). J. Ornamental Hort., 6(1): 39-41.
    38. Shylaja, M. R. and Nair, G. S. (2003). In: National Seminar on New Perspectives in Spices, Medicinal and Aromatic
    39. Plants held at Goa, pp.18-22.
    40. Tejaswini, S. et al (2006). Indian J. Genet., 66(1): 71-72.
    41. Velmurugan, M. (2007). Ph.D. Thesis submitted to Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore.
    42. Velmurugan, M. et al (2008). In. Proc. National Conference on Modern Trends in Plant in vitro Biology.
    43. Bharathidasan University, Triuchirapalli, India.
    44. Walther, F. and Sauer, A. (1990). Plant Breed., 105: 137-143.
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Agricultural Reviews

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)