Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 37 issue 2 (april 2014) : 212-222

PEST SPECTRA, SUCCESSION AND ITS YIELD LOSSES IN MUNGBEAN AND URDBEAN UNDER CHANGING CLIMATIC SCENARIO

P. Duraimurugan*, K. Tyagi1
1Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur-208 024, India.
Cite article:- Duraimurugan* P., Tyagi1 K. (2024). PEST SPECTRA, SUCCESSION AND ITS YIELD LOSSES IN MUNGBEAN AND URDBEAN UNDER CHANGING CLIMATIC SCENARIO. Legume Research. 37(2): 212-222. doi: 10.5958/j.0976-0571.37.2.032.

ABSTRACT

Field experiments were carried out to explore the change in pest spectra, their status, succession and yield loss in mungbean and urdbean under changing climatic scenario. The pest spectra comprised of 35 species on mungbean and 25 species on urdbean during kharif season and 17 species were recorded during summer season in both the crops. Broad mite (Polyphagotarsonemus latus), blister beetle (Mylabris pustulata) and spotted pod borer (Maruca vitrata) has assumed the status of major pests during kharif season as compared to earlier report at Kanpur location. Bean flower thrips (Megalurothrips usitatus), a major pest during spring/summer seasons has now become major pest in kharif season also. The avoidable losses due to pest complex on different varieties of mungbean ranged from 27.03 to 38.06% with an average of 32.97%. The avoidable losses due to pest complex on different varieties of urdbean ranged from 15.62 to 30.96% with an average of 24.03%. Seed treatment with imidacloprid 17.8 SL caused 40.2 to 81.4% reduction in sucking pests. Foliar application of monocrotophos 36 SL @ 0.04% at 35, 45 and 55 days after sowing resulted in mean per cent reduction of 35.6 to 90.3% in insect and mite pests.

REFERENCES

  1. Ali, M. and Shivkumar. (2006). Advances in mungbean and urdbean. Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, India. 462p.
  2. Anonymous, (1997). Annual Research Report, Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, India.
  3. Amarnath, K. (2000). Management of soybean pod borer, Cydia ptychora (Torticidae: Lepidoptera). M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, India.
  4. Dhuri, A.V. and Singh, K.M. (1983). Pest complex and succession of insect pests in black gram Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper. Indian J. Entomol. 45(4): 396-401.
  5. Gerson, U. (1992). Biology and control of the broad mite, Polyphagotarsonemus latus (Banks) (Acari: Tarsonemidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 13: 163-178.
  6. Giraddi, R.S., Amaranth, K., Chandrasekhar, Kedanuri, B. and Patil, R.S. (2000). Late sowing and dry spell cause pest outbreak in kharif pulses. Insect Environment. 6(1): 24.
  7. Jagadish, K.S. and Jayaramaiah. (2005). Distribution pattern of the tobacco aphid Myzus nicotianae (Homoptera: Aphididae) and its comparative biology. J. Ecobiology. 17(3): 229-234.
  8. Kooner, B.S., Cheema, H.K. and Kaur, R. (2006). Insect pests and their management. In: Advances in mungbean and urdbean (Eds. M. Ali and Shivkumar), Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur. pp.335-401.
  9. Lal, S.S. (1987). Insect pests of mung, urd, cowpea and pea and their management. In: Plant Protection in Field Crops (Eds. M.V. Rao and S. Sithanantham), Plant Protection Association of India, Hyderabad, India. pp.185-201.
  10. Lal, S.S. and Ahmad, R. (2001). Integrated insect pest management - present status and strategies in pulses. In: Proceedings of National Symposium on Pulses for Sustainable Agriculture and Nutritional Security, New Delhi, India, 17-19 April, 2001. pp.101-110,
  11. Murugesan, N. and Kavitha, A. (2009). Seed treatment with Pseudomonas fluorescens, plant products and synthetic insecticides against the leafhopper, Amrasca devastans (Distant) in cotton. J. Biopesticides. 2(1): 22-25.
  12. Reddy, M.V., Sharma, S.B., and Nene, Y.L. (1990). Pigeonpea disease management. In: The pigeonpea (Eds. Y.L. Nene, S.D. Hall and V.K. Sheila), CAB International, Wallingfold, Oxon, U.K. and ICRISAT, Patancheru, India. pp.303-347.
  13. Sehgal, V.K. and Ujagir, R. (1988). Insect pests and their management of mungbean in India. In: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Mungbean, Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Shanhua, Taiwan. pp.315-328.
  14. Singh, K.M. and Singh, R.N. (1977). Succession of insect pests in greengram and blackgram under dryland conditions at Delhi. Indian J. Entomol. 39(4): 365-370.
  15. Singh, R. and Kalra, V.K. (1995). Studies on the insect pest complex associated with summer mungbean, Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek and urdbean, Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper in Haryana. J. Insect Sci. 8(2): 181-184.
  16. Vishwadhar and Rathore, Y.S. (1994). Pattern of population distribution of Aceria cajani on pigeonpea plant. Indian J. Pulses Res. 7(2): 137-143.
  17. Zhang, L., Greenberg, S.M., Zhang, Y., Liu, T.X. (2011). Effectiveness of thiamethoxam and imidacloprid seed treatments against Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) on cotton. Pest Manag. Sci. 67(2): 226-232.
  18. Soundararajan, R.P. and Chitra, N. (2011). Effect of bioinoculants on sucking pests and pod borer complex in urdbean. J. Biopesticides. 4(1): 7 – 11.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)